So anyone who has grievances for: bad services, undelivered services, missed refunds, and other such things can also thank you for allowing him to continue to do so
I've been one of the first ones to jump into C1V when they firstly released their offers here. All I can say is that I've never needed to open a ticket despite a few of initial issues which were quickly handled by simple LES DMs. I'm not hosting anything intensive, so I can't evaluate if there's overselling or not, but it works for my use case, and for what I've paid for, more than happy.
C1V is not perfect, and yes, I've suffered from network outages like everyone. But cmon, this is fucking basement level prices, and I've been having a waaay better experience with C1V than with the other basement host everyone knows here, who basically "scammed" me.
So anyone who has grievances for: bad services, undelivered services, missed refunds, and other such things can also thank you for allowing him to continue to do so
No way to please everyone.
We try to filter out and prevent scams - as much as possible.
For other stuff - there is a wide range of service quality and prices (even in the low-end sector alone).
There are reviews and LESbian feedback, so people can make an informed decision (according to their level of acceptable risk).
Relja of House Novović, the First of His Name, King of the Plains, the Breaker of Chains, WirMach Wolves pack member BikeGremlin's web-hosting reviews
Given the lack of outrage here, I don't think he has negatively impacted enough people here to warrant a cancellation. However, I am also uncertain about the quantity of orders placed though here and the number of clients who are experiencing difficulties.
I don't think providers should be banned here for offences committed on the other forums, unless those offences were very serious in nature.
c1vhosting Rome is down.
Dang it, Rome has fallen.
21:27 my VPN to c1v drops, website goes into cloudflare "I'm under attack" mode
On the website, these messages appear:
22:47 trying to reach Rome/Pomezia POP (couldn't he just walk down from the apartment to the garage?)
22:57 looking for the outage source...
23:44 asking for physical support...
08:42 issue has been found...
12:31 waiting for Rome provider intervention...
So a single provider going down can bring down the whole POP? The datacenter is advertised as a Tier 3 (1+N) so this should not happen at all.
(in the meanwhile, I wonder how he's currently juggling between going to school and managing a provider)
c1vhosting Rome is down.
Dang it, Rome has fallen.
21:27 my VPN to c1v drops, website goes into cloudflare "I'm under attack" mode
On the website, these messages appear:
22:47 trying to reach Rome/Pomezia POP (couldn't he just walk down from the apartment to the garage?)
22:57 looking for the outage source...
23:44 asking for physical support...
08:42 issue has been found...
12:31 waiting for Rome provider intervention...
So a single provider going down can bring down the whole POP? The datacenter is advertised as a Tier 3 (1+N) so this should not happen at all.
(in the meanwhile, I wonder how he's currently juggling between going to school and managing a provider)
im sure you read wrong, its Budget Tier - State of the Argh
"A VPS doesn't have dedicated resources (and so, guaranteed performances) of course.” -c1vhosting
"Don't order this server if you expect high performance as this is a low-end offering." -c1vhosting
@tenpera said:
I've been enjoying 8G vps, no problem at all for 10euro.
Kindly share the YABS for the VPS.
Thanks!
Sometimes i feel yabs is way over rated and people use yabs as a gold standard regardless of the use case.
A low score on one area or all may still be fine with a different usecase (like idling). Or hosting a simple site...
Plus it's a snapshot in time so chances are it may vary good or bad significantly over time.
Specifically yabs from the latest offer is not going to be any different than others posted already.
@tenpera said:
I've been enjoying 8G vps, no problem at all for 10euro.
Kindly share the YABS for the VPS.
Thanks!
Sometimes i feel yabs is way over rated and people use yabs as a gold standard regardless of the use case.
A low score on one area or all may still be fine with a different usecase (like idling). Or hosting a simple site...
if the use case is idling, then it does not really matter if GB6 score is 78 or 278 or 1278.
However it does matter if the use case is wordpress site.
@carlin0 said:
In my opinion they should take away the provider tag here as well
+1
People complaining about the cheap service when they willingly paid for it without checking the reviews first; now even want the host tag to be removed cause their service sucks? You must be out of your mind.
If the host is a scam, took your money and never gave you a server, or ran away or terminated your account without valid reason, then I understand taking away the provider tag (or just ban them). If you want premium service, pay premium. Go with AWS, Oracle cloud, or Azure. Don't loiter around LES/LET and go with random no-bodies offering bargain basement prices.
@tenpera said:
I've been enjoying 8G vps, no problem at all for 10euro.
Kindly share the YABS for the VPS.
Thanks!
Sometimes i feel yabs is way over rated and people use yabs as a gold standard regardless of the use case.
A low score on one area or all may still be fine with a different usecase (like idling). Or hosting a simple site...
if the use case is idling, then it does not really matter if GB6 score is 78 or 278 or 1278.
**However it does matter if the use case is wordpress site. **
Why would you want to run a WordPress site on an oversold node with no minimum performance guarantees, and where the offer mentioned
Don't order this server if you expect high performance as this is a low-end offering.
and went on to say " Potato is better".
There is low end, there is frugal, there is cheap, and then there is plain silly.
if the use case is idling, then it does not really matter if GB6 score is 78 or 278 or 1278.
However it does matter if the use case is wordpress site.
Why would you want to run a WordPress site on an oversold node with no minimum performance guarantees, and where the offer mentioned
Don't order this server if you expect high performance as this is a low-end offering.
and went on to say " Potato is better".
There is low end, there is frugal, there is cheap, and then there is plain silly.
I agree 100% with you. And, I did NOT go with €10 VPS that is "worse than potato" (provider's own words)
Here is GB5 score my low end VPS and working perfectly for my use case
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1198
Multi Core | 1189
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22439169
@tenpera said:
I've been enjoying 8G vps, no problem at all for 10euro.
Kindly share the YABS for the VPS.
Thanks!
Sometimes i feel yabs is way over rated and people use yabs as a gold standard regardless of the use case.
A low score on one area or all may still be fine with a different usecase (like idling). Or hosting a simple site...
if the use case is idling, then it does not really matter if GB6 score is 78 or 278 or 1278.
However it does matter if the use case is wordpress site.
Again it's subjective. A low volume site would still be OK. Heck I have used micro dedis (or similar) from nat4vps and it seemed to give 2 digit gb scored and worked wonders for my non idling usecase.
Maybe you just have something against this provider who has been clear with the performance experience from get go..
@tenpera said:
I've been enjoying 8G vps, no problem at all for 10euro.
Kindly share the YABS for the VPS.
Thanks!
Sometimes i feel yabs is way over rated and people use yabs as a gold standard regardless of the use case.
A low score on one area or all may still be fine with a different usecase (like idling). Or hosting a simple site...
if the use case is idling, then it does not really matter if GB6 score is 78 or 278 or 1278.
However it does matter if the use case is wordpress site.
Again it's subjective. A low volume site would still be OK. Heck I have used micro dedis (or similar) from nat4vps and it seemed to give 2 digit gb scored and worked wonders for my non idling usecase.
Maybe you just have something against this provider who has been clear with the performance experience from get go..
Or maybe not. I am probably not awake...
Cheers
Other then idling (which is the proper use case for these low end deals) running a wordpress is not recommended as most often people will setup apache, mysql (without optimization), php and then install wordpress. Some even go as far as to install a free hosting panel to make it easy for them, not realizing that all of these are taking their performance away.
Low end servers mean:
no sql database (unless you know how to change the config for low ram usage)
No apache. Nginx is acceptble sometimes
No nodejs. They require a lot of CPU cycles (atleast when i was building an app on them). You can prebuild them on another server and serve the app using nginx as that will run in the user's browser.
Good for running low end python based scripts
Good for using it as a static file host (if you dont mind the delay in loading the content)
This sounds more like a lover’s tiff… since very few other reasons could justify so much grief for a service not taken.
Probably @c1vhosting might have stood her up on a date or something and now all she can do is rant.
I would argue that nginx is about low-end. It is just more resource efficient and therefore is a wise choice even for high-end scenarios when you have to serve as much requests per second as possible.
No matter what the server is, if I don't need to support Apache-only web applications, I would go with nginx.
@vyas said:
This sounds more like a lover’s tiff… since very few other reasons could justify so much grief for a service not taken.
Probably @c1vhosting might have stood her up on a date or something and now all she can do is rant.
It's 2024. They could both me he or she or inbetween or both or none or a cat....
@localhost said: @somik essentially the user screws up without optimization/ tuning... or user unneeded services and then moan about how shitt the performance is...
Well I mean I would understand it if the user is new on the forum, saw a good deal and grabbed it up. But he is from October 2022. If he still don't know the type of performance many super low end hosts offers here, I dunno what to say. I mean there is a 8.7K comments long thread of compalins about VirMach...
I would argue that nginx is about low-end. It is just more resource efficient and therefore is a wise choice even for high-end scenarios when you have to serve as much requests per second as possible.
No matter what the server is, if I don't need to support Apache-only web applications, I would go with nginx.
That I agree with. I use nginx on my dedicated servers as well. Only time I would use apache is if i need apache tomcat server for application deployments.
Comments
I've been one of the first ones to jump into C1V when they firstly released their offers here. All I can say is that I've never needed to open a ticket despite a few of initial issues which were quickly handled by simple LES DMs. I'm not hosting anything intensive, so I can't evaluate if there's overselling or not, but it works for my use case, and for what I've paid for, more than happy.
C1V is not perfect, and yes, I've suffered from network outages like everyone. But cmon, this is fucking basement level prices, and I've been having a waaay better experience with C1V than with the other basement host everyone knows here, who basically "scammed" me.
No way to please everyone.
We try to filter out and prevent scams - as much as possible.
For other stuff - there is a wide range of service quality and prices (even in the low-end sector alone).
There are reviews and LESbian feedback, so people can make an informed decision (according to their level of acceptable risk).
Relja of House Novović, the First of His Name, King of the Plains, the Breaker of Chains, WirMach Wolves pack member
BikeGremlin's web-hosting reviews
Given the lack of outrage here, I don't think he has negatively impacted enough people here to warrant a cancellation. However, I am also uncertain about the quantity of orders placed though here and the number of clients who are experiencing difficulties.
I don't think providers should be banned here for offences committed on the other forums, unless those offences were very serious in nature.
Surely no lack of outage though
https://www.c1vhosting.it/
SwiftKey kept typing/recommending outage in that line, which I had to correct to outrage.
Maybe, SwiftKey, the AI keyboard, was right!
c1vhosting Rome is down.
Dang it, Rome has fallen.
Free NAT KVM | Free NAT LXC | Bobr
Ransacked by Goths...
Relja of House Novović, the First of His Name, King of the Plains, the Breaker of Chains, WirMach Wolves pack member
BikeGremlin's web-hosting reviews
Infrastructure upgrade, moving hardware to a better facility, set up to be finished by the end of the month (don't ask which month).
21:27 my VPN to c1v drops, website goes into cloudflare "I'm under attack" mode
On the website, these messages appear:
22:47 trying to reach Rome/Pomezia POP (couldn't he just walk down from the apartment to the garage?)
22:57 looking for the outage source...
23:44 asking for physical support...
08:42 issue has been found...
12:31 waiting for Rome provider intervention...
So a single provider going down can bring down the whole POP? The datacenter is advertised as a Tier 3 (1+N) so this should not happen at all.
(in the meanwhile, I wonder how he's currently juggling between going to school and managing a provider)
im sure you read wrong, its Budget Tier - State of the Argh
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
Everything should be b....
Thanks man, the network is up.
Faster than my expectation.
MicroLXC is lovable. Uptime of C1V
Search Google for reviews above from @c1vhosting before buying VPS, his servers are terrible, best to stay away
LMFTFY
As that's what you're likely to get - allegedly
It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away.
NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh)
"A VPS doesn't have dedicated resources (and so, guaranteed performances) of course.” -c1vhosting
"Don't order this server if you expect high performance as this is a low-end offering." -c1vhosting
LinuxFreek.com
yes please ! he is a joke not a provider
LinuxFreek.com
I've been enjoying 8G vps, no problem at all for 10euro.
Kindly share the YABS for the VPS.
Thanks!
Sometimes i feel yabs is way over rated and people use yabs as a gold standard regardless of the use case.
A low score on one area or all may still be fine with a different usecase (like idling). Or hosting a simple site...
Plus it's a snapshot in time so chances are it may vary good or bad significantly over time.
Specifically yabs from the latest offer is not going to be any different than others posted already.
if the use case is idling, then it does not really matter if GB6 score is 78 or 278 or 1278.
However it does matter if the use case is wordpress site.
People complaining about the cheap service when they willingly paid for it without checking the reviews first; now even want the host tag to be removed cause their service sucks? You must be out of your mind.
If the host is a scam, took your money and never gave you a server, or ran away or terminated your account without valid reason, then I understand taking away the provider tag (or just ban them). If you want premium service, pay premium. Go with AWS, Oracle cloud, or Azure. Don't loiter around LES/LET and go with random no-bodies offering bargain basement prices.
Websites have ads, I have ad-blocker.
Why would you want to run a WordPress site on an oversold node with no minimum performance guarantees, and where the offer mentioned
and went on to say " Potato is better".
There is low end, there is frugal, there is cheap, and then there is plain silly.
———-
blog | exploring visually |
I agree 100% with you. And, I did NOT go with €10 VPS that is "worse than potato" (provider's own words)
Here is GB5 score my low end VPS and working perfectly for my use case
Again it's subjective. A low volume site would still be OK. Heck I have used micro dedis (or similar) from nat4vps and it seemed to give 2 digit gb scored and worked wonders for my non idling usecase.
Maybe you just have something against this provider who has been clear with the performance experience from get go..
Or maybe not. I am probably not awake...
Cheers
Other then idling (which is the proper use case for these low end deals) running a wordpress is not recommended as most often people will setup apache, mysql (without optimization), php and then install wordpress. Some even go as far as to install a free hosting panel to make it easy for them, not realizing that all of these are taking their performance away.
Low end servers mean:
Websites have ads, I have ad-blocker.
This sounds more like a lover’s tiff… since very few other reasons could justify so much grief for a service not taken.
Probably
@c1vhosting might have stood her up on a date or something and now all she can do is rant.
———-
blog | exploring visually |
@somik essentially the user screws up without optimization/ tuning... or user unneeded services and then moan about how shitt the performance is...
I would argue that nginx is about low-end. It is just more resource efficient and therefore is a wise choice even for high-end scenarios when you have to serve as much requests per second as possible.
No matter what the server is, if I don't need to support Apache-only web applications, I would go with nginx.
Check our KVM VPS (flags are clickable): 🇵🇱 🇸🇪 | Looking glass: 🇵🇱 🇸🇪
It's 2024. They could both me he or she or inbetween or both or none or a cat....
Well I mean I would understand it if the user is new on the forum, saw a good deal and grabbed it up. But he is from
October 2022. If he still don't know the type of performance many super low end hosts offers here, I dunno what to say. I mean there is a 8.7K comments long thread of compalins about VirMach...That I agree with. I use nginx on my dedicated servers as well. Only time I would use apache is if i need apache tomcat server for application deployments.
Websites have ads, I have ad-blocker.