Black Friday SNEAK PEAK - Epyc based 5Gbps KVM VPS in Netherlands and USA 50% off + DOUBLE BW in US!

2»

Comments

  • edited November 2023
    root@srv-WV8V5W:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-09-06                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Nov  1 13:21:28 EDT 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 1 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7402P 24-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2794.748 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 461.3 MiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 19.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
    Kernel     : 5.10.0-23-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : IncogNET LLC
    ASN        : AS210630 IncogNET LLC
    Host       : IncogNET LLC
    Location   : Naaldwijk, South Holland (ZH)
    Country    : **Netherlands**
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 87.34 MB/s   (21.8k) | 146.64 MB/s   (2.2k)
    Write      | 87.57 MB/s   (21.8k) | 147.42 MB/s   (2.3k)
    Total      | 174.92 MB/s  (43.7k) | 294.06 MB/s   (4.5k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 285.35 MB/s    (557) | 410.34 MB/s    (400)
    Write      | 300.52 MB/s    (586) | 437.67 MB/s    (427)
    Total      | 585.87 MB/s   (1.1k) | 848.01 MB/s    (827)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 4.58 Gbits/sec  | 4.19 Gbits/sec  | 7.93 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 4.53 Gbits/sec  | 4.07 Gbits/sec  | 10.1 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 4.98 Gbits/sec  | 4.41 Gbits/sec  | 1.98 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 851 Mbits/sec   | 83.8 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.30 Gbits/sec  | 524 Mbits/sec   | 76.5 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 443 Mbits/sec   | 95.7 Mbits/sec  | 121 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 681 Mbits/sec   | 374 Mbits/sec   | 152 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 4.69 Gbits/sec  | 4.17 Gbits/sec  | 6.65 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 4.06 Gbits/sec  | 4.09 Gbits/sec  | 9.92 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 4.95 Gbits/sec  | 4.32 Gbits/sec  | 1.99 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.12 Gbits/sec  | 494 Mbits/sec   | 83.5 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.40 Gbits/sec  | 562 Mbits/sec   | 76.5 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 938 Mbits/sec   | 302 Mbits/sec   | 121 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 547 Mbits/sec   | 524 Mbits/sec   | 151 ms
    
    Geekbench test failed and low memory was detected. Add at least 1GB of SWAP or use GB4 instead (higher compatibility with low memory systems).
    
    YABS completed in 7 min 3 sec
    
    root@srv-GAT81J:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-09-06                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Nov  1 13:21:29 EDT 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 1 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2994.374 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 457.8 MiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 39.3 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-9-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : IncogNet LLC
    ASN        : AS210630 IncogNET LLC
    Host       : Incognet LLC
    Location   : Allentown, Pennsylvania (PA)
    Country    : **United States**
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 101.09 MB/s  (25.2k) | 277.29 MB/s   (4.3k)
    Write      | 101.35 MB/s  (25.3k) | 278.75 MB/s   (4.3k)
    Total      | 202.44 MB/s  (50.6k) | 556.05 MB/s   (8.6k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 278.20 MB/s    (543) | 373.83 MB/s    (365)
    Write      | 292.98 MB/s    (572) | 398.73 MB/s    (389)
    Total      | 571.19 MB/s   (1.1k) | 772.57 MB/s    (754)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 900 Mbits/sec   | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 146 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 687 Mbits/sec   | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 81.6 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 708 Mbits/sec   | 486 Mbits/sec   | 151 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 416 Mbits/sec   | 59.9 Mbits/sec  | 170 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 4.71 Gbits/sec  | 4.35 Gbits/sec  | 67.4 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 507 Mbits/sec   | 166 Mbits/sec   | 91.6 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 819 Mbits/sec   | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 87.4 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 488 Mbits/sec   | 552 Mbits/sec   | 146 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 527 Mbits/sec   | 560 Mbits/sec   | 140 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 525 Mbits/sec   | 89.5 Mbits/sec  | 151 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 461 Mbits/sec   | 3.26 Mbits/sec  | 169 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 599 Mbits/sec   | 577 Mbits/sec   | 67.4 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 764 Mbits/sec   | 944 Mbits/sec   | 90.8 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 769 Mbits/sec   | 307 Mbits/sec   | 87.5 ms
    
    Geekbench test failed and low memory was detected. Add at least 1GB of SWAP or use GB4 instead (higher compatibility with low memory systems).
    
    YABS completed in 7 min 21 sec
    
  • @MannDude said:

    @sh97 said:
    @MannDude I saw above you said transfer can be done to PA. Would it be possible to move my Liberty Lake service to NL as well?

    Absolutely. Just open a ticket. A bit behind on tickets but will try to knock them out today.

    Wow, that was very, very fast! Ticket response within 10 mins, migration in 15. Thank you!

  • @terrorgen said:

    @MannDude said: How so?

    From my perspective, crunchbits and you compete for the same pool of customers here but they also own resources that you run your business on... (what I can see, Idk what Idk)

    I know they are nice guys, but I am trained to sniff out conflicts of interest, so...

    I mean by that logic Crunchbits competes with their upstream IonSwitch. Hosting is complicated sometimes, and all three companies are ultimately going for something different when it comes to target customers. Like @MannDude said, it's really not uncommon, I see it all the time.

    Thanked by (2)MannDude treesmokah
  • crunchbitscrunchbits Hosting Provider
    edited November 2023

    @fluttershy said:

    @terrorgen said:

    @MannDude said: How so?

    From my perspective, crunchbits and you compete for the same pool of customers here but they also own resources that you run your business on... (what I can see, Idk what Idk)

    I know they are nice guys, but I am trained to sniff out conflicts of interest, so...

    I mean by that logic Crunchbits competes with their upstream IonSwitch. Hosting is complicated sometimes, and all three companies are ultimately going for something different when it comes to target customers. Like @MannDude said, it's really not uncommon, I see it all the time.

    Time is a flat circle, everyone competes with everyone for a dollar. It also comes down to what market segment you want to target.

    I value what @MannDude brings to the table (as a provider, his niche) and I think he is much better suited to handle that than we are internally. I don't know if he's still blowing his millions over on Khaosan Road in Bangkok, but I do know that we specifically try to offer him deals that make sense (for both of us--of course, but there is significant value in dealing with 1 @MannDude versus 500 individual customers). It isn't just him, there are some other providers using us (public or private, not for me to spill) and we value that business as well. I have personally modified/dropped parts our product stacks to not compete with our downstreams. There's a reason we don't offer certain things we definitely have the hardware/capacity to offer, and there are certain segments I think myself (and our team) are generally better suited to focus on.

    That being said, I don't think we compete with IonSwitch :)

  • MannDudeMannDude Hosting Provider

    @crunchbits said:

    @fluttershy said:

    @terrorgen said:

    @MannDude said: How so?

    From my perspective, crunchbits and you compete for the same pool of customers here but they also own resources that you run your business on... (what I can see, Idk what Idk)

    I know they are nice guys, but I am trained to sniff out conflicts of interest, so...

    I mean by that logic Crunchbits competes with their upstream IonSwitch. Hosting is complicated sometimes, and all three companies are ultimately going for something different when it comes to target customers. Like @MannDude said, it's really not uncommon, I see it all the time.

    Time is a flat circle, everyone competes with everyone for a dollar. It also comes down to what market segment you want to target.

    I value what @MannDude brings to the table (as a provider, his niche) and I think he is much better suited to handle that than we are internally. I don't know if he's still blowing his millions over on Khaosan Road in Bangkok, but I do know that we specifically try to offer him deals that make sense (for both of us--of course, but there is significant value in dealing with 1 @MannDude versus 500 individual customers). It isn't just him, there are some other providers using us (public or private, not for me to spill) and we value that business as well. I have personally modified/dropped parts our product stacks to not compete with our downstreams. There's a reason we don't offer certain things we definitely have the hardware/capacity to offer, and there are certain segments I think myself (and our team) are generally better suited to focus on.

    That being said, I don't think we compete with IonSwitch :)

    Maybe millions of Zimbabwean Dollars. But I'm more into hopping around Phetchaburi to Trang, skipping the Soi 6's and Khaosan Roads of abroad.

    Thanked by (1)Wonder_Woman

    [ IncogNET LLC ] - Privacy By Design
    We believe that privacy and freedom of expression are two very important things, so we offer solutions to accessing and publishing content safely.
    [ USA: Liberty Lake, WA | Kansas City, MO | Allentown, PA ] [EU: Naaldwijk, NL ] [ CL Shared | KVM VPS | VPN | Dedicated Servers | Domain Names ]

  • MannDudeMannDude Hosting Provider

    There is a decent chance we'll also begin to offer our CloudLinux Shared hosting in both Liberty Lake, WA and Allentown, PA later this month.

    We're waiting on some updates in our KC location and we'll migrate our Texas shared hosting customers to KC. This is the only service (Texas shared hosting) not on our network currently.

    Thanked by (2)FrankZ Wonder_Woman

    [ IncogNET LLC ] - Privacy By Design
    We believe that privacy and freedom of expression are two very important things, so we offer solutions to accessing and publishing content safely.
    [ USA: Liberty Lake, WA | Kansas City, MO | Allentown, PA ] [EU: Naaldwijk, NL ] [ CL Shared | KVM VPS | VPN | Dedicated Servers | Domain Names ]

Sign In or Register to comment.