KVM - 512MB RAM - 100GB DISK - €12.00 p/year [UK/USA]

InceptionHostingInceptionHosting Hosting ProviderOG
edited December 2019 in Offers

For this weekend only, the 512mb storage plan has been reduced.

Use coupon code: LESstoragedec2019

UK: https://clients.inceptionhosting.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=204
USA: https://clients.inceptionhosting.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=206

  • 1 CPU Core (fair share none dedicated)
  • 512 MB Ram
  • 100 GB Disk space - Raid 5
  • 500 GB Bandwidth @ 1 gbit (shared - unmetered inbound)
  • 1 IPv4 address
  • /64 IPv6 (UK Only)

This is an LES Exclusive deal.

Offer expired, regular pricing is €13.00 p/year.

https://inceptionhosting.com
Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.

Thanked by (11)vpsgeek AlwaysSkint Sova mikho uptime Brueggus Decicus beagle jqr bdl Asim
Tagged:

Comments

  • AdamAdam OG

    What's the host nodes like on these?

    They must be beasts.

  • InceptionHostingInceptionHosting Hosting ProviderOG
    edited December 2019

    Not really, older gen CPU's L5649's, H710 raid card + bbu and big spinner disks, I believe they mostly run on R410's

    Thanked by (3)vpsgeek uptime Adam

    https://inceptionhosting.com
    Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.

  • AdamAdam OG

    I was referring to them as beasts -Storage Wise-

    For something that is just for storage them CPU'S are perfectly fine!

    Anyhoo €12/y is a great price!

  • InceptionHostingInceptionHosting Hosting ProviderOG

    To be honest it just made me sad not to see anything under exclusive deals :)

    Thanked by (5)AlwaysSkint iaecm uptime seanho Ympker

    https://inceptionhosting.com
    Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.

  • tetechtetech OG

    What's a reasonable iops limit while being a good neighbor on these servers? I've got a database that needs around 40-50 tps. Best to ask first...

  • jqrjqr OG

    Dang it @AnthonySmith! I thought I was done shopping. I planned on using the ServaRICA storage deal for my nextcloud, but now I worried about all the places where I might go that don't have IPv6 enabled yet. This is very tempting...

    It's pronounced hacker.

  • uptimeuptime OG
    edited December 2019

    @AnthonySmith said:
    This is an LES Exclusive deal.

    Adam said: €12/y is a great price

    @AnthonySmith said:
    To be honest it just made me sad not to see anything under exclusive deals :)

    And it does indeed look pretty sharp there

    HS4LIFE (+ (* 3 4) (* 5 6))

  • elliotcelliotc OG

    I throught blackfriday ended already :o

    Action and Reaction in history

  • InceptionHostingInceptionHosting Hosting ProviderOG
    edited December 2019

    @tetech said:
    What's a reasonable iops limit while being a good neighbor on these servers? I've got a database that needs around 40-50 tps. Best to ask first...

    Well, I think it would be a bad idea to run a database on a box on spinners specifically made for storage but you are welcome to do it anyway if performance is no t important to you, I don’t know what IOPS 50tps will generate so I can’t really answer that, ideally under 300 avg would be my best guess.

    Thanked by (1)tetech

    https://inceptionhosting.com
    Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.

  • NeoonNeoon OG

    Well, If the Doctor, the real DOCTOR, had not offered me a 150GB VM for 10$/y, I may snagged.

    Free NAT KVM | Free NAT LXC | Bobr
    ITS WEDNESDAY MY DUDES

  • InceptionHostingInceptionHosting Hosting ProviderOG

    @Neoon said:
    Well, If the Doctor, the real DOCTOR, had not offered me a 150GB VM for 10$/y, I may snagged.

    Nice, feel free to link to that deal also if it is an ongoing one?

    https://inceptionhosting.com
    Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.

  • tetechtetech OG

    @AnthonySmith said:

    @tetech said:
    What's a reasonable iops limit while being a good neighbor on these servers? I've got a database that needs around 40-50 tps. Best to ask first...

    Well, I think it would be a bad idea to run a database on a box on spinners specifically made for storage but you are welcome to do it anyway if performance is no t important to you, I don’t know what IOPS 50tps will generate so I can’t really answer that, ideally under 300 avg would be my best guess.

    Thanks for the guidance. It would be running it as a slave for backup, so latency isn't important. I've always treated tps and iops the same per this page:

    IOPS, or I/O per second, is measured as the sum of ( r/s + w/s ). If using iostat without the -x option, the iops value is under the tps (transactions per second) column.

    For my DB master this number is 48 averaged over the past 30 days. Not intending to hijack the thread, but if you're measuring iops differently, could you say how?

  • InceptionHostingInceptionHosting Hosting ProviderOG
    edited December 2019

    @tetech said:

    @AnthonySmith said:

    @tetech said:
    What's a reasonable iops limit while being a good neighbor on these servers? I've got a database that needs around 40-50 tps. Best to ask first...

    Well, I think it would be a bad idea to run a database on a box on spinners specifically made for storage but you are welcome to do it anyway if performance is no t important to you, I don’t know what IOPS 50tps will generate so I can’t really answer that, ideally under 300 avg would be my best guess.

    Thanks for the guidance. It would be running it as a slave for backup, so latency isn't important. I've always treated tps and iops the same per this page:

    IOPS, or I/O per second, is measured as the sum of ( r/s + w/s ). If using iostat without the -x option, the iops value is under the tps (transactions per second) column.

    For my DB master this number is 48 averaged over the past 30 days. Not intending to hijack the thread, but if you're measuring iops differently, could you say how?

    If you have done the research I am happy to yeild to your knowledge, I have literally never even considered how many IOPS an sql transaction is, I assumed it would be more than 1 but for no reason.

    If it turns out to be problematic and you don't care about performance I will just limit it for you so no one looses.

    https://inceptionhosting.com
    Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.

  • tetechtetech OG

    @AnthonySmith said:

    @tetech said:

    @AnthonySmith said:

    @tetech said:
    What's a reasonable iops limit while being a good neighbor on these servers? I've got a database that needs around 40-50 tps. Best to ask first...

    Well, I think it would be a bad idea to run a database on a box on spinners specifically made for storage but you are welcome to do it anyway if performance is no t important to you, I don’t know what IOPS 50tps will generate so I can’t really answer that, ideally under 300 avg would be my best guess.

    Thanks for the guidance. It would be running it as a slave for backup, so latency isn't important. I've always treated tps and iops the same per this page:

    IOPS, or I/O per second, is measured as the sum of ( r/s + w/s ). If using iostat without the -x option, the iops value is under the tps (transactions per second) column.

    For my DB master this number is 48 averaged over the past 30 days. Not intending to hijack the thread, but if you're measuring iops differently, could you say how?

    If you have done the research I am happy to yeild to your knowledge, I have literally never even considered how many IOPS an sql transaction is, I assumed it would be more than 1 but for no reason.

    If it turns out to be problematic and you don't care about performance I will just limit it for you so no one looses.

    Ahh I was talking about a "disk transaction" not a "SQL transaction", so maybe we are actually speaking the same language. In that case maybe I am well inside your parameters, but if it does end up problematic I'd be happy for you to limit it. Thank you.

  • NeoonNeoon OG

    @AnthonySmith said:

    @Neoon said:
    Well, If the Doctor, the real DOCTOR, had not offered me a 150GB VM for 10$/y, I may snagged.

    Nice, feel free to link to that deal also if it is an ongoing one?

    Its a old deal, from a few years ago.

    Free NAT KVM | Free NAT LXC | Bobr
    ITS WEDNESDAY MY DUDES

  • havochavoc OGContent Writer

    Yeha will def grab one. Looking for a mirror as backup. And both my others are same provider so that doesn't work

  • jqrjqr OG

    At first I was upset because I was away for the weekend and missed out, but then I realized, it's only €1, and @AnthonySmith is already doing a great service by running this place. In for one at the (still unbeatable) regular price.

    It's pronounced hacker.

  • fredfred OG

    This servers runs on colocrossing?

  • SolaireSolaire OG

    @fred said:
    This servers runs on colocrossing?

    I think @AnthonySmith is with IOFlood in Phoenix, US. He's with @Clouvider in the UK.

    Thanked by (2)Clouvider Asim
  • vimalwarevimalware OG

    @Solaire said:

    @fred said:
    This servers runs on colocrossing?

    I think @AnthonySmith is with IOFlood in Phoenix, US. He's with @Clouvider in the UK.

    Yes. These are the locations for the storage offers.

  • InceptionHostingInceptionHosting Hosting ProviderOG

    @fred said:
    This servers runs on colocrossing?

    No, never.

    https://inceptionhosting.com
    Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.

  • AsimAsim OGServices Provider

    I missed the offer but the regular pricing is not a lot as well

  • RahulRahul OG
    edited December 2019

    @fred said:
    This servers runs on colocrossing?

    If you trust your gut, you won't use coloncrossing.

  • greensysadmingreensysadmin OG
    edited December 2019

    Just sounding out some opinions here...

    I have an Inception London NAT LES VZ7 box with @AnthonySmith on the old 128MB RAM, 350GB bandwidth plan that's been phased out, but recently I've been using more bandwidth and am looking to bump from 350GB to 500GB. All I host on it is OpenVPN and Wireguard.

    I could either get one of the new 256MB RAM, 500GB bandwidth OV7 LES boxes that are €5 a year (which have the same 3GB disk allocation as my current box), or bump up to this €13 KVM which bumps the RAM again and gets me loads more disk space, as well as the benefits of KVM.

    Which is the better choice? Is this KVM Big Storage running on SSD cached or just spinning disks? I would probably look to take advantage of the extra space to make it a Borg backup server or Nextcloud in addition to the OpenVPN and Wireguard setup.

  • InceptionHostingInceptionHosting Hosting ProviderOG

    Just spinners in raid 5 I don’t think it will really matter for a vpn either way though :)

    Thanked by (2)greensysadmin Asim

    https://inceptionhosting.com
    Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.

Sign In or Register to comment.

© LowEndSpirit 2024

ipv6 ready