OS : CentOS 7.7.1908 (64 Bit)
Virt/Kernel : KVM / 5.4.6-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz
CPU Cores : 4 @ 2199.998 MHz x86_64 4096 KB Cache
CPU Flags : AES-NI Enabled & VM-x/AMD-V Disabled
Load Average : 0.17, 0.06, 0.01
Total Space : 28G (11G ~38% used)
Total RAM : 2995 MB (417 MB + 506 MB Buff in use)
Total SWAP : 2047 MB (0 MB in use)
Uptime : 2 days 1:19
ASN & ISP : AS36352, ColoCrossing
Organization : ColoCrossing
Location : New York, United States / US
Region : New York
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
## Geekbench v4 CPU Benchmark:
Single Core : 1560 (POOR)
Multi Core : 4361
Not all vCPU are the same:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OS : CentOS 7.7.1908 (64 Bit)
Virt/Kernel : KVM / 5.4.7-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz
CPU Cores : 4 @ 2199.998 MHz x86_64 4096 KB Cache
CPU Flags : AES-NI Enabled & VM-x/AMD-V Disabled
Load Average : 0.44, 0.50, 0.24
Total Space : 60G (6.0G ~10% used)
Total RAM : 3938 MB (131 MB + 223 MB Buff in use)
Total SWAP : 0 MB (0 MB in use)
Uptime : 0 days 13:59
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASN & ISP : AS8100, QuadraNet Enterprises LLC
Organization : Crowncloud US LLC
Location : Los Angeles, United States / US
Region : California
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
## Geekbench v4 CPU Benchmark:
Single Core : 2407 (GOOD)
Multi Core : 7283
## IO Test
CPU Speed:
bzip2 : 73.0 MB/s
sha256 : 185 MB/s
md5sum : 356 MB/s
RAM Speed:
Avg. write : 1200.7 MB/s
Avg. read : 4232.5 MB/s
Disk Speed:
1st run : 742 MB/s
2nd run : 794 MB/s
3rd run : 825 MB/s
-----------------------
Average : 787.0 MB/s
## Global Speedtest
Location Upload Download Ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net 546.45 Mbit/s 860.27 Mbit/s 2.823 ms
USA, New York (AT&T) 111.23 Mbit/s 230.12 Mbit/s 67.353 ms
USA, Chicago (Windstream) 236.91 Mbit/s 222.87 Mbit/s 55.363 ms
USA, Dallas (Frontier) 246.17 Mbit/s 60.50 Mbit/s 54.349 ms
USA, Miami (Frontier) 150.92 Mbit/s 193.15 Mbit/s 88.841 ms
USA, Los Angeles (Spectrum) 469.24 Mbit/s 832.65 Mbit/s 3.122 ms
UK, London (Community Fibre) 143.63 Mbit/s 116.24 Mbit/s 125.151 ms
France, Lyon (SFR) 79.73 Mbit/s 144.03 Mbit/s 146.033 ms
Germany, Berlin (DNS:NET) 118.48 Mbit/s 179.04 Mbit/s 154.215 ms
Spain, Madrid (MasMovil) 95.94 Mbit/s 156.43 Mbit/s 169.063 ms
Italy, Rome (Unidata) 108.51 Mbit/s 156.32 Mbit/s 161.270 ms
Russia, Moscow (MTS) 81.03 Mbit/s 174.63 Mbit/s 181.174 ms
Israel, Haifa (013Netvision) 64.92 Mbit/s 33.35 Mbit/s 193.016 ms
India, New Delhi (GIGATEL) 23.59 Mbit/s 103.37 Mbit/s 258.747 ms
Singapore (FirstMedia) 65.19 Mbit/s 32.07 Mbit/s 165.475 ms
Japan, Tsukuba (SoftEther) 147.19 Mbit/s 258.15 Mbit/s 116.383 ms
Australia, Sydney (Yes Optus) 75.58 Mbit/s 56.96 Mbit/s 155.480 ms
RSA, Randburg (Cool Ideas) 19.20 Mbit/s 46.88 Mbit/s 310.858 ms
Brazil, Sao Paulo (Criare) 71.41 Mbit/s 198.84 Mbit/s 192.236 ms
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in : 11 min 0 sec
Timestamp : 2020-01-03 02:30:58 GMT
Sharing this bad boy from @HostDoc LA. My first gateway drug into a Ryzen VPS.
As a side note, I’ve been looking for a Ryzen-based VPS since Ryzen was first released. I upgraded my personal PC to Ryzen on day one and it’s been flawless. I wonder why it took so long for them to trickle down to servers. Stability issues?
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
# Yet-Another-Bench-Script #
# v2019-10-08 #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
Fri Jan 3 12:52:47 PST 2020
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
CPU cores : 5 @ 3792.872 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 5.8G
Swap : 1.0G
Disk : 29G
Performing disk performance test. This may take a couple minutes to co
Disk Speed Tests:
---------------------------------
| Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 | Avg
| | | |
Write | 383.00 MB/s | 308.00 MB/s | 333.00 MB/s | 341.33 MB/s
Read | 678.51 MB/s | 694.23 MB/s | 670.40 MB/s | 681.04 MB/s
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Bouygues Telecom | Paris, FR (10G) | 360 Mbits/sec | 651 Mbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 1.48 Gbits/sec | 1.31 Gbits/sec
Severius | The Netherlands (10G) | 357 Mbits/sec | 337 Mbits/sec
Worldstream | The Netherlands (10G) | 586 Mbits/sec | 1.10 Gbits/sec
wilhelm.tel | Hamburg, DE (10G) | 456 Mbits/sec | 1.10 Gbits/sec
Biznet | Bogor, Indonesia (1G) | busy | busy
Hostkey | Moscow, RU (1G) | 78.6 Mbits/sec | 799 Mbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 3.14 Gbits/sec | 2.80 Gbits/sec
Airstream Communications | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G) | 631 Mbits/sec | 680 Mbits/sec
Hurricane Electric | Fremont, CA, US (10G) | 7.33 Gbits/sec | busy
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Bouygues Telecom | Paris, FR (10G) | 315 Mbits/sec | 722 Mbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 425 Mbits/sec | 105 Mbits/sec
Severius | The Netherlands (10G) | 440 Mbits/sec | 212 Mbits/sec
Worldstream | The Netherlands (10G) | 706 Mbits/sec | 733 Mbits/sec
wilhelm.tel | Hamburg, DE (10G) | 588 Mbits/sec | 1.06 Gbits/sec
Airstream Communications | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G) | 570 Mbits/sec | 950 Mbits/sec
Hurricane Electric | Fremont, CA, US (10G) | 6.62 Gbits/sec | busy
Performing Geekbench 4 benchmark test. This may take a couple minutes
Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 5414
Multi Core | 18682
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/15099735
@ouvoun said:
As a side note, I’ve been looking for a Ryzen-based VPS since Ryzen was first released. I upgraded my personal PC to Ryzen on day one and it’s been flawless. I wonder why it took so long for them to trickle down to servers. Stability issues?
The issue is the perception that Ryzens are "consumer" CPUs and are somehow inferior or unsuitable as a server. A CPU is a CPU and those who think that Xeons have some magic sauce that makes it superior in performance are just funny people in my opinion.
@ouvoun said:
As a side note, I’ve been looking for a Ryzen-based VPS since Ryzen was first released. I upgraded my personal PC to Ryzen on day one and it’s been flawless. I wonder why it took so long for them to trickle down to servers. Stability issues?
The issue is the perception that Ryzens are "consumer" CPUs and are somehow inferior or unsuitable as a server. A CPU is a CPU and those who think that Xeons have some magic sauce that makes it superior in performance are just funny people in my opinion.
Things like Epyc platforms do have some benefits for enterprise. People aren't adopting Ryzen in servers simply because they weren't meant for it. Server builders don't do Ryzen, because it's a desktop chip, and most people rely on server builders. The very few people that do it upcharege by a lot because it's a risk and low demand.
@ouvoun said:
As a side note, I’ve been looking for a Ryzen-based VPS since Ryzen was first released. I upgraded my personal PC to Ryzen on day one and it’s been flawless. I wonder why it took so long for them to trickle down to servers. Stability issues?
The issue is the perception that Ryzens are "consumer" CPUs and are somehow inferior or unsuitable as a server. A CPU is a CPU and those who think that Xeons have some magic sauce that makes it superior in performance are just funny people in my opinion.
Things like Epyc platforms do have some benefits for enterprise. People aren't adopting Ryzen in servers simply because they weren't meant for it. Server builders don't do Ryzen, because it's a desktop chip, and most people rely on server builders. The very few people that do it upcharege by a lot because it's a risk and low demand.
I am not sure what is the meaning of "not meant for it" because computing processes on a Ryzen, EPYC, i9 or Xeon are the same. Demand wise, it is subject to change. I can see the demand for AMD in servers going up for varying reasons. I still maintain that intrinsically, there is no functional difference between a desktop chip or a server chip.
@ouvoun said:
As a side note, I’ve been looking for a Ryzen-based VPS since Ryzen was first released. I upgraded my personal PC to Ryzen on day one and it’s been flawless. I wonder why it took so long for them to trickle down to servers. Stability issues?
The issue is the perception that Ryzens are "consumer" CPUs and are somehow inferior or unsuitable as a server. A CPU is a CPU and those who think that Xeons have some magic sauce that makes it superior in performance are just funny people in my opinion.
Things like Epyc platforms do have some benefits for enterprise. People aren't adopting Ryzen in servers simply because they weren't meant for it. Server builders don't do Ryzen, because it's a desktop chip, and most people rely on server builders. The very few people that do it upcharege by a lot because it's a risk and low demand.
I am not sure what is the meaning of "not meant for it" because computing processes on a Ryzen, EPYC, i9 or Xeon are the same. Demand wise, it is subject to change. I can see the demand for AMD in servers going up for varying reasons. I still maintain that intrinsically, there is no functional difference between a desktop chip or a server chip.
Maybe that wasn't the best word, but I mean the manufacturer doesn't create them for servers. Epyc has features Ryzen doesn't. To most people it doesn't matter, only to the companies with the specific use.
People aren't adopting Ryzen in servers simply because they weren't meant for it
Exactly this. AMD knows the market, and the home market has a lower margin and need for faster product churn. The enterprise market has much larger margins for higher priced sku's.
Hardware vendors aren't selling it. Dell/HP/Cisco are the major US players for enterprise servers, and they are not selling Ryzen based servers. For a business, the server gear is generally not a differentiating factor for the business -- they want vendor support, compatibility, and availability of systems.
Major software vendors aren't supporting it. No Ryzen CPU is on the VMware HCL. No support if you, like most businesses, are running VMware.
So if you're building your own business servers, and running a bare metal operating system, or hyperv, or cloudstack, or something not VMware your good so far.
Ryzen also is limited to 128GB of ram. This may seem sufficient, but VMware licenses generally cost more than the server does. If I can get an Epyc server with 512GB ram, vs a Ryzen with 128GB, and my workloads are not CPU bound, I can save $50k in VMware licensing (1 socket vs 4) for an Enterprise+ installation.
@t0ny0 said:
Alright time for my bench!!
Thanks @seriesn - that VPS is a friggin beast!!!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Region: USA https://bench.monster v.1.4.9 2019-12-24
Usage : curl -LsO bench.monster/speedtest.sh; bash speedtest.sh -USA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OS : Ubuntu 18.10 (64 Bit)
Virt/Kernel : KVM / 4.18.0-10-generic
CPU Model : AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor
CPU Cores : 10 @ 3593.246 MHz x86_64 512 KB Cache
CPU Flags : AES-NI Enabled & VM-x/AMD-V Disabled
Load Average : 0.05, 0.01, 0.00
Total Space : 197G (1.5G ~1% used)
Total RAM : 9991 MB (121 MB + 478 MB Buff in use)
Total SWAP : 0 MB (0 MB in use)
Uptime : 0 days 0:3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASN & ISP : AS23470, FranTech Solutions
Organization : Nexus Bytes LLC
Location : Township of Piscataway, United States / US
Region : New Jersey
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
## Geekbench v4 CPU Benchmark:
Single Core : 5375 (EXCELLENT)
Multi Core : 24740
## IO Test
CPU Speed:
bzip2 : 135 MB/s
sha256 : 287 MB/s
md5sum : 631 MB/s
RAM Speed:
Avg. write : 3140.3 MB/s
Avg. read : 10103.5 MB/s
Disk Speed:
1st run : 1.3 GB/s
2nd run : 1.3 GB/s
3rd run : 1.2 GB/s
-----------------------
Average : 1297.1 MB/s
## USA Speedtest
Location Upload Download Ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net 376.46 Mbit/s 315.87 Mbit/s 43.964 ms
USA, New York (AT&T) 858.19 Mbit/s 504.95 Mbit/s 2.219 ms
USA, Boston (Starry, Inc.) 609.07 Mbit/s 306.72 Mbit/s 8.961 ms
USA, Washington, DC (AT&T) 633.02 Mbit/s 377.12 Mbit/s 7.457 ms
USA, Charlotte, NC (AT&T) 388.76 Mbit/s 167.91 Mbit/s 24.946 ms
USA, Atlanta (Frontier) 403.05 Mbit/s 172.57 Mbit/s 28.522 ms
USA, Miami (Frontier) 345.27 Mbit/s 157.42 Mbit/s 33.558 ms
USA, Nashville (Sprint) 368.23 Mbit/s 324.14 Mbit/s 22.433 ms
USA, Indianapolis (Metronet) 538.61 Mbit/s 215.51 Mbit/s 21.280 ms
USA, Cleveland (AT&T) 353.14 Mbit/s 198.42 Mbit/s 22.011 ms
USA, Chicago (Windstream) 367.12 Mbit/s 230.83 Mbit/s 16.596 ms
USA, St. Louis (AT&T) 371.98 Mbit/s 164.67 Mbit/s 25.125 ms
USA, Minneapolis (US Internet) 492.01 Mbit/s 223.65 Mbit/s 25.797 ms
USA, Kansas City (UPNfiber) 427.79 Mbit/s 213.81 Mbit/s 30.605 ms
USA, Oklahoma City (OneNet) 335.62 Mbit/s 119.65 Mbit/s 46.462 ms
USA, Dallas (Windstream) 368.17 Mbit/s 122.83 Mbit/s 39.417 ms
USA, San Antonio, TX (AT&T) 213.76 Mbit/s 80.86 Mbit/s 47.184 ms
USA, Denver (Vistabeam) 305.30 Mbit/s 147.81 Mbit/s 46.103 ms
USA, Albuquerque (Plateau Tel) 186.04 Mbit/s 72.88 Mbit/s 57.013 ms
USA, Phoenix (Cox) 180.90 Mbit/s 63.45 Mbit/s 74.299 ms
USA, Salt Lake City (UTOPIA) 302.76 Mbit/s 75.73 Mbit/s 52.543 ms
USA, Helena, MT (The Fusion) 254.41 Mbit/s 113.72 Mbit/s 54.917 ms
USA, Las Vegas (LV.Net) 187.70 Mbit/s 76.36 Mbit/s 75.597 ms
USA, Seattle (Sprint) 213.72 Mbit/s 262.45 Mbit/s 62.615 ms
USA, San Francisco (AT&T) 180.80 Mbit/s 66.41 Mbit/s 70.776 ms
USA, Los Angeles (Spectrum) 140.42 Mbit/s 88.69 Mbit/s 60.016 ms
USA, Anchorage (Alaska Com) 182.99 Mbit/s 73.26 Mbit/s 91.319 ms
USA, Pearl City, HI (Sprint) 138.84 Mbit/s 157.96 Mbit/s 117.693 ms
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in : 10 min 56 sec
Timestamp : 2020-01-02 19:16:14 GMT
Saved in : /root/speedtest.log
Share results:
- http://www.speedtest.net/result/8909134821.png
- https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/15096550
- https://clbin.com/FHS5W
Throw me a towel, cause my wet areas need drying!
What the fuck is THAT!? How much did that beast cost?
The beasts from Bandito and Nexus Bytes Mafia Family cost less than low end atom/i3 dedicated for sure. Not sure why those are even a thing when I see such VPS.
@ionswitch_stan said:
Hard to beat AMD on "value" at this point (performance per dollar), especially the 3900X... which crushes pretty much anything around it.
AMD owns the single-core performance market up and down the list from servers to desktop.
From a building aspect, 3900x is absolutely the best bang for the bucks!
@cybertech said:
Old is Gold from San Jose:
note fio 4K block, 4GB size shows 45K IOPS on write
MaxIOPS is real
Nice. Upcloud has always made IOPS its selling point relative to its competitors. I have't had the time to bench them, but I feel good knowing they are using prem Intel Golds. Explains why it was so buttery smooth when I was using them for a project.
Comments
Not all vCPU are the same:
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
That's some serious shit. You got the deal of the year man!
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
ExoticVM.com - Find VPS in exotic locations! | MonitorDNS.com - domain for sale!
Sharing this bad boy from @HostDoc LA. My first gateway drug into a Ryzen VPS.
As a side note, I’ve been looking for a Ryzen-based VPS since Ryzen was first released. I upgraded my personal PC to Ryzen on day one and it’s been flawless. I wonder why it took so long for them to trickle down to servers. Stability issues?
It don’t be like it is until it do.
The issue is the perception that Ryzens are "consumer" CPUs and are somehow inferior or unsuitable as a server. A CPU is a CPU and those who think that Xeons have some magic sauce that makes it superior in performance are just funny people in my opinion.
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
Things like Epyc platforms do have some benefits for enterprise. People aren't adopting Ryzen in servers simply because they weren't meant for it. Server builders don't do Ryzen, because it's a desktop chip, and most people rely on server builders. The very few people that do it upcharege by a lot because it's a risk and low demand.
ExtraVM
I am not sure what is the meaning of "not meant for it" because computing processes on a Ryzen, EPYC, i9 or Xeon are the same. Demand wise, it is subject to change. I can see the demand for AMD in servers going up for varying reasons. I still maintain that intrinsically, there is no functional difference between a desktop chip or a server chip.
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
I'm also not sure either as given the computing power and tdp it looks real nice and also ECC support
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
Maybe that wasn't the best word, but I mean the manufacturer doesn't create them for servers. Epyc has features Ryzen doesn't. To most people it doesn't matter, only to the companies with the specific use.
ExtraVM
Exactly this. AMD knows the market, and the home market has a lower margin and need for faster product churn. The enterprise market has much larger margins for higher priced sku's.
Hardware vendors aren't selling it. Dell/HP/Cisco are the major US players for enterprise servers, and they are not selling Ryzen based servers. For a business, the server gear is generally not a differentiating factor for the business -- they want vendor support, compatibility, and availability of systems.
Major software vendors aren't supporting it. No Ryzen CPU is on the VMware HCL. No support if you, like most businesses, are running VMware.
So if you're building your own business servers, and running a bare metal operating system, or hyperv, or cloudstack, or something not VMware your good so far.
Ryzen also is limited to 128GB of ram. This may seem sufficient, but VMware licenses generally cost more than the server does. If I can get an Epyc server with 512GB ram, vs a Ryzen with 128GB, and my workloads are not CPU bound, I can save $50k in VMware licensing (1 socket vs 4) for an Enterprise+ installation.
Ionswitch.com | High Performance VPS in Seattle and Dallas since 2018
QuantumCore Qubit1 single core monster:
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
What the fuck is THAT!? How much did that beast cost?
Vultr high frequency , with extra IOPING:
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
sharing the monster from "banditos", @Delong
The beasts from Bandito and Nexus Bytes Mafia Family cost less than low end atom/i3 dedicated for sure. Not sure why those are even a thing when I see such VPS.
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
I stan scaleway (vps@2,99/m)
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/ce268379-9072-4d92-8e51-28c6d73e42c2
This is quite good
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
I'm spinning up a bare metal one to do a bench
Here we go:
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/15105032
Not very impressive when this is 40 core.. especially when put beside Bandito 5 core shared lol
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
Sadly yes, but that's to be expected when comparing an Intel Server CPU from 2 years ago and an AMD Consumer CPU
AMD have made incredibly powerful processors recently it seems.
Get the best deal on your next VPS or Shared/Reseller hosting from RacknerdTracker.com - The original aff garden.
AMD powa!
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
True, but the difference is curiously not reflected in pricing.
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
intel's gonna drop prices for chips but those existing hardware gonna lose out
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
Hard to beat AMD on "value" at this point (performance per dollar), especially the 3900X... which crushes pretty much anything around it.
AMD owns the single-core performance market up and down the list from servers to desktop.
Ionswitch.com | High Performance VPS in Seattle and Dallas since 2018
From a building aspect, 3900x is absolutely the best bang for the bucks!
Nexus Bytes Ryzen Powered NVMe VPS | NYC|Miami|LA|London|Netherlands| Singapore|Tokyo
Storage VPS | LiteSpeed Powered Web Hosting + SSH access | Switcher Special |
Old is Gold from San Jose:
note fio 4K block, 4GB size shows 45K IOPS on write
MaxIOPS is real
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
Nice. Upcloud has always made IOPS its selling point relative to its competitors. I have't had the time to bench them, but I feel good knowing they are using prem Intel Golds. Explains why it was so buttery smooth when I was using them for a project.
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
What have we got here
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.