US KVM ipv4 VPS $2/mo with recurring 50% OFF all orders + Free FTP250G Storage Account

Comments

• DrNutella

  2:27AM

  PSA: Please read their AUP. You don’t have freedom of speech when using this provider.

  “Disparage, tarnish, or harm us or the Services.”

  Thanked by (1)imok

  Insert signature here, $5 tip required
• vyas OGSenpai

  2:43AM

  @DrNutella said:
  PSA: Please read their AUP. You don’t have freedom of speech when using this provider.

  “Disparage, tarnish, or harm us or the Services.”

  Nothing wrong with that. Why would you want to do anything illegal in the name of free speech anyways ?

  Thanked by (1)CharityHost_org

  blog | exploring visually |
• DrNutella

  3:00AM edited 3:24AM

  @vyas said:

  @DrNutella said:
  PSA: Please read their AUP. You don’t have freedom of speech when using this provider.

  “Disparage, tarnish, or harm us or the Services.”

  Nothing wrong with that. Why would you want to do anything illegal in the name of free speech anyways ?

  This means if you publicly share a bad experience, then it’s grounds for banning your service.

  Honestly that’s just absurd. Every other host usually accepts any and all feedback vs shuns users who say anything.

  Insert signature here, $5 tip required
• Alyx

  5:35AM

  Would avoid them, they snoop trough your data

  Thanked by (2)Khalequzzaman imok
• CharityHost_org Hosting Provider

  6:28AM

  @Alyx said:
  Would avoid them, they snoop trough your data

  How so? Public data in public_html? Know your facts dont make assumptions
• vyas OGSenpai

  6:28AM edited 6:31AM

  @DrNutella said:

  @vyas said:

  @DrNutella said:
  PSA: Please read their AUP. You don’t have freedom of speech when using this provider.

  “Disparage, tarnish, or harm us or the Services.”

  Nothing wrong with that. Why would you want to do anything illegal in the name of free speech anyways ?

  This means if you publicly share a bad experience, then it’s grounds for banning your service.

  Honestly that’s just absurd. Every other host usually accepts any and all feedback vs shuns users who say anything.

  “Disparage, tarnish, or harm us or the Services.”

  and

  "if you publicly share a bad experience, then it’s grounds for banning your service."

  I see your point. That's the Tarnish/disparage part. Harm can also mean doing "naughty" things with network, or sharing some types of "iso" files that may be frowned upon etc. That is where my first comment came from. Thanks for clarification.

  ---

  @Alyx said:
  Would avoid them, they snoop trough your data

  Someone had put it nicely.. this is called Peeking into my garden.
  Peeking is not cool

  Thanked by (1)Khalequzzaman

  blog | exploring visually |
• CharityHost_org Hosting Provider

  6:29AM

  @DrNutella said:

  @vyas said:

  @DrNutella said:
  PSA: Please read their AUP. You don’t have freedom of speech when using this provider.

  “Disparage, tarnish, or harm us or the Services.”

  Nothing wrong with that. Why would you want to do anything illegal in the name of free speech anyways ?

  This means if you publicly share a bad experience, then it’s grounds for banning your service.

  Honestly that’s just absurd. Every other host usually accepts any and all feedback vs shuns users who say anything.

  We accept constructive criticism, but not insults and berating staff in public or private support tickets.
• Alyx

  7:03AM

  @CharityHost_org said:

  @Alyx said:
  Would avoid them, they snoop trough your data

  How so? Public data in public_html? Know your facts dont make assumptions

  So I'm allowed to look through my customers data in the public_html folder even tho there is actual a authentication mechanism infront of it?

  Is it just the public_html folder or do you snoop trough all folders called public?

  Since facts are so important to you, it's probably also worth mention that the site was not actually connected to any valid domain, and therefore not actually publicly accessible.

  Thanked by (1)ialexpw
• CharityHost_org Hosting Provider

  7:15AM

  Since when did public_hmtl have auth on ti? You need to setup htpasswd and htaccess for that!

  Look up, man curl. if you know anything about cli cmd in linux or even windows. Look for --resolve.
• CharityHost_org Hosting Provider

  7:17AM

  @vyas said:

  @DrNutella said:

  @vyas said:

  @DrNutella said:
  PSA: Please read their AUP. You don’t have freedom of speech when using this provider.

  “Disparage, tarnish, or harm us or the Services.”

  Nothing wrong with that. Why would you want to do anything illegal in the name of free speech anyways ?

  This means if you publicly share a bad experience, then it’s grounds for banning your service.

  Honestly that’s just absurd. Every other host usually accepts any and all feedback vs shuns users who say anything.

  “Disparage, tarnish, or harm us or the Services.”

  and

  "if you publicly share a bad experience, then it’s grounds for banning your service."

  I see your point. That's the Tarnish/disparage part. Harm can also mean doing "naughty" things with network, or sharing some types of "iso" files that may be frowned upon etc. That is where my first comment came from. Thanks for clarification.

  ---

  @Alyx said:
  Would avoid them, they snoop trough your data

  Someone had put it nicely.. this is called Peeking into my garden.
  Peeking is not cool

  public browse into the open public park with curl --resolve from a hosting management perspective is not intruding privacy on public_html hosted data. Let's be clear and sensible.
• ialexpw OGServices Provider

  7:26AM edited 7:49AM

  @CharityHost_org said:
  Since when did public_hmtl have auth on ti? You need to setup htpasswd and htaccess for that!

  Look up, man curl. if you know anything about cli cmd in linux or even windows. Look for --resolve.

  You said in the previous thread the user did not have a domain connected to the storage and that you do not have a default domain for each box - so how was it public?. Would be good to clear that part up if possible.

  Thanked by (1)Alyx
• vyas OGSenpai

  7:29AM edited 7:36AM

  @CharityHost_org said:

  @vyas said:

  @DrNutella said:

  @vyas said:

  @DrNutella said:
  PSA: Please read their AUP. You don’t have freedom of speech when using this provider.

  “Disparage, tarnish, or harm us or the Services.”

  Nothing wrong with that. Why would you want to do anything illegal in the name of free speech anyways ?

  This means if you publicly share a bad experience, then it’s grounds for banning your service.

  Honestly that’s just absurd. Every other host usually accepts any and all feedback vs shuns users who say anything.

  “Disparage, tarnish, or harm us or the Services.”

  and

  "if you publicly share a bad experience, then it’s grounds for banning your service."

  I see your point. That's the Tarnish/disparage part. Harm can also mean doing "naughty" things with network, or sharing some types of "iso" files that may be frowned upon etc. That is where my first comment came from. Thanks for clarification.

  ---

  @Alyx said:
  Would avoid them, they snoop trough your data

  Someone had put it nicely.. this is called Peeking into my garden.
  Peeking is not cool

  public browse into the open public park with curl --resolve from a hosting management perspective is not intruding privacy on public_html hosted data. Let's be clear and sensible.

  If you search the threads, (vanilla's poor search capabilities notwithstanding), "Peeking into garden" has a very clear meaning as does "iso" or "chicken". I am very clear in my statement about the peeking part. If you interpret it otherwise, that is your prerogative. On the other hand,

  If you think that is NOT sensible, then I wish you well. With that attitude, may you get customers who are okay with a high horse rider. I am not, and this concludes my message in this or any other discussion where your hosting is involved. Best regards.

  Edit: Have self flagged my posts, since the conversation is heading nowhere, and in community spirit.

  Thanked by (2)Alyx ialexpw

  blog | exploring visually |
• Alyx

  7:30AM edited 7:30AM

  @CharityHost_org said:
  Since when did public_hmtl have auth on ti? You need to setup htpasswd and htaccess for that!

  Look up, man curl. if you know anything about cli cmd in linux or even windows. Look for --resolve.

  The issue here is, to check if a .htaccess exist, you first need to look in the directory.

  Ahh, I was waiting for that argument.
  So, you say anyone could have accessed the file if they

  A: Know the server IP address
  B: know the none existing domain name
  C: Know that this none existing domain name is actually "hosted" on said IP address
  D : Actually make the effort to spoof the host header in a request to said server

  I'm sorry my friend, but this really does not public to me

  Thanked by (2)ialexpw Khalequzzaman