VirMach - Complain - Moan - Praise - Chit Chat

1355356357358359361»

Comments

  • VirMachVirMach Hosting Provider

    @AlwaysSkint said: Need more options in NW and central USA, IMHO.

    @JBB said: OKC sounded great, but I gather those plans are on hold?

    Oregon, Utah, and Colorado were all being considered. However, the location we'll be launching is Oklahoma City.

    OKC Launch

    We're going to be doing this location a little bit differently. I wanted to confirm with you guys that this finally is moving forward. I was going to wait until we actually got it done, but it's probably a good idea to gather some feedback at an earlier stage so we can make any requested changes more easily.

    This will likely be initially done as an unofficial launch, as we figure things out. So maybe watch out for an interesting sale. We're also doing our own network for the first time and there will be some type of disclaimer about that.

    Network - As currently planned

    Network will be done with an IPv6 focus, where possible + IPv4 NAT. We may provide dedicated IPv4 at either a high setup cost, or for certain line of services (generally at about +$5/YR extra as per usual but no price lock.)

    • Lumen on 10Gbps
    • Cogent on 1Gbps (for now)
    • OKC-iX (Hurricane Electric, Cloudflare)

    Software & Branding - As currently planned.

    So as I mentioned, we're going to be doing this location differently and that also includes likely using VirtFusion or some other system that does better with IPv6. These services may end up under their own branding, other than some exceptions. We may also finally want to do proper "cloud" using Fleio/OpenStack.

    It will also be the first location where we "officially" try to do IPv6 for the VirMach brand, where we'll have a portion of the servers dedicated to this brand and do it the same way (with SolusVM.)

    Hardware - As currently planned

    • Ryzen - same/similar leftover Ryzen servers.
    • Epyc - any existing Epyc that we never deployed, plus a few new.
    • Storage - some limited storage, and central backups.
    • Rented dedicated servers - see below

    We'll be building out dedicated servers to rent to customers directly. The focus will be mainly on Ryzen dedicated servers as planned several years ago. We'll honor these at agreed upon previous pricing for any dedicated server customers that purchased E3 to upgrade to Ryzen (someone remind me on the specific promises so we can try to get this done.) Likely Ryzen 2600 to 3700X, but potentially up to 3800X depending on how the budget is split. We may try to keep the MSRP the same on all variations, kind of like a hybrid grab bag, so they will likely not be "stacked out" but instead balanced, lopsided in some way (more RAM, more CPU, or more disk.) Just got 40 motherboards delivered.

    We will also try to do some interesting things with anything left over. We still technically have hundreds of E3's, some E5's, as well as older GPUs.

    Colocation Product - As currently planned

    I wanted to give a little more information and general planned pricing for this, for anyone interested.

    $69/MO - Per 1U/1A 208V/100Mbps (or 50TB @ 1Gbps)

    Included per 1U:

    • 1 x PDU Port
    • 2 x switch ports
    • 1x /56 IPv6

    Optional additions:

    • +$25/MO - Each additional 100Mbps 95th
    • +$175/MO - Upgrade to 1Gbps 95th
    • +$10/MO - 1 PDU Port
    • +$8/MO - /29 IPv4 (Subleased)
    • $120 One-time - /30 IPv4 (Static)

    Timeline - As currently planned

    We'll likely have the first cabinet ready first or second week of April, with Cogent coming in Mid-April and Lumen by the end of the month. I'm currently trying to decide on routers and have those ordered in as well.

    I'll try to push to have at least a few servers set up at this location immediately, so anyone who wants to have their service migrated can do so, if anyone is interested in providing early feedback on the network.

  • announcing a major product launch on page 361 of a complaints thread... B)

  • AlwaysSkintAlwaysSkint OGSenpai
    edited March 30

    All very interesting.
    As always, I'm game to be a Guinea Pig. I have a surplus of VPS in NYC, so easy to find a migration candidate, though IPv4 is my modus operandi.
    Available for immediate migration: " AbandonedJaunty-VM" id=721293 (chosen due to single IPv4: a multi-IP is also available should you wish to challenge a SolusVM to Virtfusion migration.)

    It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away.
    NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh)

  • FrankZFrankZ ModeratorOGRetired
    edited March 30

    I'm in for OKC as well. Should be interesting.
    I look forward to the launch 🚀 🚀

    Thanked by (1)Wonder_Woman
  • skorousskorous OGSenpai

    As with @AlwaysSkint , I'm always game to test.

  • In for the testing. Lumen is generally prem.
    Good luck, fingers crossed!

    Thanked by (2)admax FrankZ
  • Hello, @VirMach .

    Could you please reply my ticket #238520? It has almost been 6 weeks.
    If you are busy at your current work, maybe at least tell me in this thread when my ticket will be reviewed so I don't have to check it every day??

  • @VirMach said:
    Oregon, Utah, and Colorado were all being considered. However, the location we'll be launching is Oklahoma City.

    I like it!

    Network will be done with an IPv6 focus, where possible + IPv4 NAT. We may provide dedicated IPv4 at either a high setup cost, or for certain line of services (generally at about +$5/YR extra as per usual but no price lock.)

    Ouch. I like IPv6, but losing IPv4 isn't workable for me yet. I find IPv4 NAT icky.

    I'll try to push to have at least a few servers set up at this location immediately, so anyone who wants to have their service migrated can do so, if anyone is interested in providing early feedback on the network.

    I'd be fine with migrating early from Chicago to OKC to help test things out, but only with dedicated IPv4.

    Thanked by (1)AlwaysSkint
  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King

    Virtfuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuusion

    Thanked by (2)admax imok

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • I am in for OKC @VirMach

  • I've got plenty of services to migrate for testing :)

    Thanked by (1)FrankZ
  • imokimok OG
    edited March 31

    Is 1200GB NVMe server finally here?

    @VirMach said: We still technically have hundreds of E3's, some E5's

    Where are the deals?

    Thanked by (1)localhost
  • i'd be happy to migrate anything left in CHI to OKC to beta

  • @VirMach said:
    Network will be done with an IPv6 focus

    Is it routed ?

    Thanked by (1)VirMach

    No hostname left!

  • VirMachVirMach Hosting Provider

    A little more clarification on how it would work for the "VirMach" portion of OKC.

    It'd be exactly the same. We'd used leased IPv4, likely with however frequent renumberings that occur and any limitations. Same control panel, plans, and server specifications. This would just receive "official" IPv6 support as our first location that does for VirMach, and it is planned to be with IPv4 NAT for that portion, with static IPv4 (our own, it could technically still be renumbered at some point but the process more within our control.) This means the IPv6 portion still relies on our in-house system which has not yet been fully coded out.

    In regards to IPv6, this still means if you want day one guaranteed support for it and it being treated as the primary connectivity, it'd be under a different sub-brand (it could potentially be done loosely where it's still technically VirMach.)

    @AlwaysSkint said: As always, I'm game to be a Guinea Pig. I have a surplus of VPS in NYC, so easy to find a migration candidate, though IPv4 is my modus operandi.

    @FrankZ said:
    I'm in for OKC as well. Should be interesting.
    I look forward to the launch 🚀 🚀

    @skorous said:
    As with @AlwaysSkint , I'm always game to test.

    @JBB said: I'd be fine with migrating early from Chicago to OKC to help test things out, but only with dedicated IPv4.

    @localhost said:
    I am in for OKC @VirMach

    @Wonder_Woman said:
    I've got plenty of services to migrate for testing :)

    Only one thing I can think of that would likely be a restriction: it can't be a service with more than one IPv4 for the time being as we're going to be insanely short on them.

    @imok said:
    Is 1200GB NVMe server finally here?

    @VirMach said: We still technically have hundreds of E3's, some E5's

    Where are the deals?

    I'll make a weird dedicated server for you and let you know in case you're interested.

    @yoursunny said:

    @VirMach said:
    Network will be done with an IPv6 focus

    Is it routed ?

    We're likely going to to purchase a router, maybe an MX480. Otherwise I'll just plug in the Cogent 1G line into one server directly.

  • AlwaysSkintAlwaysSkint OGSenpai

    @VirMach said: it can't be a service with more than one IPv4 for the time being..

    That rules out my remaining Chicago VPS, for now. ;)

    Looking forward to seeing what you come up with.
    :popcorn:

    It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away.
    NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh)

  • FrankZFrankZ ModeratorOGRetired

    @VirMach said: Only one thing I can think of that would likely be a restriction: it can't be a service with more than one IPv4 for the time being as we're going to be insanely short on them.

    If Chicago is the preferred, or only location, that can me migrated to OKC I'd be willing to give up my 3 extra IPv4 to do so. An appropriate price reduction would be appreciated, but is not required. If Atlanta, NYC, or Los Angeles can be migrated to OKC then I have single IPv4 VMs that can be used.

    Thanked by (1)skorous
  • Damn, I only have one at the locations which I currently have. Guess I have to look for a neat virbot deal to migrate to OKC.

Sign In or Register to comment.