Z+ / Z Plus Storage - Slot Hosting - VPS offers.

ZizzyDizzyMCZizzyDizzyMC Hosting Provider
in Offers

After 2 years of building up we finally have a good size stock available.

2TB Storage VM

  • 2 vCore (Fair use, ~33%) (Xeon E5-2690 V4)
  • 2GB RAM
  • 20GB NVMe Boot Disk
  • 1 IPv4
  • 2TB Volume (3x7 Raid-Z2 Volume)
  • $3.5 / TB / Month
  • Shared networking, 50mbps limit.
  • $7 / Month

5 for 7

  • 5GB Ram
  • 250GB NVMe
  • 2 vCore (50% fair share) (CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5600u)
  • 30mbps networking
  • 1 IPv4 address
  • $7 / Month

2GB Low power

  • 2GB Ram
  • 1 vCore (Fair share 50%) (Intel N95 cpu)
  • 50GB NVMe storage
  • 20 mbps networking
  • 1 IPv4 address
  • $3 / Month

HDD Colo / Slot Hosting

  • 2 vCore (Fair use, ~33%) (Xeon E5-2690 V4)
  • 2GB RAM
  • 20GB NVMe Boot Disk
  • 1 IPv4
  • The TB of the disk you sent in.
  • 10TB HDD, 9TB usable ~ $1.40 / TB / Month
  • 20TB HDD, 18TB usable ~ $0.70 / TB / Month
  • Shared networking, 50mbps limit.
  • Own your disk, own your data.
  • Setup cost helps ensure your disk gets sent back in non-payment.
  • This service is currently available to US Clients only at this time.
  • Additional disks can be added for $10 / month recurring.
  • $12 / Month + $15 setup

If you were an original purchaser of one of the original Z+ low power pilot systems, and your account has not been credited please put in a ticket and your account will be credited $18 to cover 6 months of the Low Power 2GB plan, which has 4x the ram, 10x the storage, and way better IOPS than the original pilot systems.

yoursunny you can put me on the ipv6 wall of shame for a bit. I haven't re-implemented everything with IPv6 because IPv9 is hard.

Order links:
Storage Storage Offers
Low Power Low Power Offers

Thanked by (2)FrankZ Blembim

Comments

  • CrabCrab

    Nice to see something different for a change. That HDD colo product is not something you see every day.

  • BlembimBlembim

    Corn field dc?

  • ZizzyDizzyMCZizzyDizzyMC Hosting Provider

    @Blembim said:
    Corn field dc?

    Yes actually. Is it the best? No. Is it stable? Past year I've averaged about 98% uptime. So definitely better than a good share of providers I've used in the past when I was a low end buyer rather than provider.

    @Crab said:
    Nice to see something different for a change. That HDD colo product is not something you see every day.

    I've seen several companies tease it, then never go through with it. I understand a lot of the whys, it's mostly a manual intervention, and wrapping any sort of automation around that is a lot of time and effort. I've automated most of this process and with time will be able to get it down to a few short button presses.

    It's something I wish others offered, and decided I'd go through with actually offering it. During it's conception one of my good friends said "What happens if something catastrophic happens and you need to mail everything back?" That's how the setup fee came to be, as a way to create a permanent fund that only gets used for shipping disks back. The other thought behind it is that I was on the losing end a number of years ago and had to cancel a colo at the end of a term due to financial hardship. I then got surprise pikachu'd by an additional $160 invoice that I wasn't allowed to make payments on.

    Thanked by (1)Blembim
  • ZizzyDizzyMCZizzyDizzyMC Hosting Provider

    I realize I forgot to post yabs of the different plans, my bad.

    2GB Low power:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2024-06-09                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Sat Nov 23 01:55:12 UTC 2024

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 6 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) N95
CPU cores  : 1 @ 1689.600 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 1.9 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 48.4 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
Kernel     : 6.8.0-48-generic
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Z Plus LLC
ASN        : AS399266 Z Plus LLC
Host       : Z Plus LLC
Location   : Sturgis, Michigan (MI)
Country    : United States

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 272.60 MB/s  (68.1k) | 600.53 MB/s   (9.3k)
Write      | 273.31 MB/s  (68.3k) | 603.69 MB/s   (9.4k)
Total      | 545.91 MB/s (136.4k) | 1.20 GB/s    (18.8k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 482.49 MB/s    (942) | 341.73 MB/s    (333)
Write      | 508.13 MB/s    (992) | 364.49 MB/s    (355)
Total      | 990.62 MB/s   (1.9k) | 706.23 MB/s    (688)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 24.7 Mbits/sec  | 23.3 Mbits/sec  | 93.7 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 22.3 Mbits/sec  | 22.0 Mbits/sec  | 260 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 25.3 Mbits/sec  | 23.6 Mbits/sec  | 25.6 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1178
Multi Core      | 1179
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9018135

YABS completed in 14 min 1 sec

    5 for 7:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2024-06-09                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Sat Nov 23 02:02:20 UTC 2024

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 6 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes
Processor  : AMD Ryzen 5 5600U with Radeon Graphics
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2312.740 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 4.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 242.1 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
Kernel     : 6.8.0-48-generic
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Z Plus LLC
ASN        : AS399266 Z Plus LLC
Host       : Z Plus LLC
Location   : Sturgis, Michigan (MI)
Country    : United States

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 221.04 MB/s  (55.2k) | 1.51 GB/s    (23.6k)
Write      | 221.62 MB/s  (55.4k) | 1.51 GB/s    (23.7k)
Total      | 442.67 MB/s (110.6k) | 3.03 GB/s    (47.3k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.40 GB/s     (2.7k) | 1.34 GB/s     (1.3k)
Write      | 1.47 GB/s     (2.8k) | 1.42 GB/s     (1.3k)
Total      | 2.88 GB/s     (5.6k) | 2.77 GB/s     (2.7k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 40.3 Mbits/sec  | busy            | 92.9 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 35.3 Mbits/sec  | busy            | 261 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | busy            | busy            | 25.1 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1490
Multi Core      | 2447
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9018197

YABS completed in 11 min 16 sec

    2TB Storage VM with 2GB of ram:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2024-06-09                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Sat Nov 23 02:06:00 UTC 2024

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 1 days, 22 hours, 32 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2599.980 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 1.9 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 19.3 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
Kernel     : 6.8.0-48-generic
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Z Plus LLC
ASN        : AS399266 Z Plus LLC
Host       : Z Plus LLC
Location   : Sturgis, Michigan (MI)
Country    : United States

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 300.05 MB/s  (75.0k) | 2.90 GB/s    (45.3k)
Write      | 300.84 MB/s  (75.2k) | 2.91 GB/s    (45.5k)
Total      | 600.90 MB/s (150.2k) | 5.81 GB/s    (90.8k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 5.80 GB/s    (11.3k) | 3.28 GB/s     (3.2k)
Write      | 6.11 GB/s    (11.9k) | 3.50 GB/s     (3.4k)
Total      | 11.91 GB/s   (23.2k) | 6.78 GB/s     (6.6k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | busy            | 92.5 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | busy            | 44.0 Mbits/sec  | 254 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 82.5 Mbits/sec  | 78.0 Mbits/sec  | 28.0 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1151
Multi Core      | 1956
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9018296

YABS completed in 11 min 47 sec

    Apologies, I forgot to post this immediately after the first post

  • BlembimBlembim

    @ZizzyDizzyMC said:
    Yes actually. Is it the best? No. Is it stable? Past year I've averaged about 98% uptime. So definitely better than a good share of providers I've used in the past when I was a low end buyer rather than provider.

    Glad to see the cornfield grown =)

    Thanked by (1)ZizzyDizzyMC
  • Lazee486Lazee486

    6TB Disk Slot Hosting
    A VPS with a 6TB Disk attached after provisioning.

    1 vCore (Fair use 33%) (Xeon E5-2690 v4)
    1GB RAM
    20GB NVMe Boot Disk
    1 IPv4
    Random 6TB disk attached (NO RAID ZFS OR BACKUPS. IF DISK DIES YOUR DATA GOES WITH!) Sorry, felt like that should be very clear.
    Fair use networking limited to 50mbps max.
    Choose billing cycle:

    $9.00 USD Monthly

    Went through their offerings, this ones unusual too :) just thought if a provider being creative it should be noticed

  • yoursunnyyoursunny OG

    @ZizzyDizzyMC said:
    HDD Colo / Slot Hosting

    • 2 vCore (Fair use, ~33%) (Xeon E5-2690 V4)
    • 2GB RAM
    • 20GB NVMe Boot Disk
    • 1 IPv4
    • The TB of the disk you sent in.
    • 10TB HDD, 9TB usable ~ $1.40 / TB / Month
    • 20TB HDD, 18TB usable ~ $0.70 / TB / Month
    • Shared networking, 50mbps limit.
    • Own your disk, own your data.
    • Setup cost helps ensure your disk gets sent back in non-payment.
    • This service is currently available to US Clients only at this time.
    • Additional disks can be added for $10 / month recurring.
    • $12 / Month + $15 setup

    Offer violates rules:
    Setup fees are not allowed on any service other than dedicated servers.

    Accepting submissions for IPv6 less than /64 Hall of Incompetence.

  • teamaccteamacc OGSenpai

    @yoursunny said:

    @ZizzyDizzyMC said:
    HDD Colo / Slot Hosting

    • 2 vCore (Fair use, ~33%) (Xeon E5-2690 V4)
    • 2GB RAM
    • 20GB NVMe Boot Disk
    • 1 IPv4
    • The TB of the disk you sent in.
    • 10TB HDD, 9TB usable ~ $1.40 / TB / Month
    • 20TB HDD, 18TB usable ~ $0.70 / TB / Month
    • Shared networking, 50mbps limit.
    • Own your disk, own your data.
    • Setup cost helps ensure your disk gets sent back in non-payment.
    • This service is currently available to US Clients only at this time.
    • Additional disks can be added for $10 / month recurring.
    • $12 / Month + $15 setup

    Offer violates rules:
    Setup fees are not allowed on any service other than dedicated servers.

    Ive seen people get around it with "$27/month with $15/month discount after first month"

    Hey teamacc. You're a dick. (c) Jon Biloh, 2020.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny OG

    No IPv6 hall of shame

    • GitHub
    • Outlook
    • SparkPost, MessageBird, MXroute
    • ColonCrossing - RackNerd, CloudServer, cheapwindowsvps, SmokyHosts
    • XetHost
    • SoftShellWeb (San Jose only)
    • KhanWebHost (Turkey etc), BatuCloud, BalHost, Hostolog
    • Wishosting
    • Reprise Hosting, ADTAQ
    • HostWebis
    • Leapswitch Networks (except Mumbai), Advin Servers (only Mumbai), HostDZire
    • DedicatServer gardens, iHostART, CloudForest, torchbyte
    • HostTiger HostTigger
    • ForwardWeb
    • SKB Enterprise
    • Watta Server, ONeil Online
    • HostMayo
    • GardenCloud gardens
    • CoreHosting
    • Hye Cloud
    • VirmAche (most locations), VPS BlackFriday
    • HostVDS
    • FireVPS
    • Rabisu
    • MyHBD
    • RackEdge
    • PulsedMedia
    • DEPLOYD
    • iNetCloud
    • TerraNode
    • CloudPacket
    • Dotdotnetwork
    • Kaisercloud
    • OrangeVPS
    • ColossusCloud ServerPoint
    • DediRock
    • Kuroit (Ashburn)
    • CubePath
    • MassiveGRID
    • Phaonix
    • CloudBlast
    • Z Plus / Zizzy
    • HostBrr (DirectAdmin storage)
    • AVA Hosting

    Include IPv6 for no extra cost on every plan in every location to get delisted.

    Thanked by (1)cold

    Accepting submissions for IPv6 less than /64 Hall of Incompetence.

  • ZizzyDizzyMCZizzyDizzyMC Hosting Provider

    @yoursunny said:
    Offer violates rules:
    Setup fees are not allowed on any service other than dedicated servers.

    I cleared it with Mason ahead of time. I can remove it if they decide it's a no go afterwards.

    @yoursunny said:
    No IPv6 hall of shame
    Include IPv6 for no extra cost on every plan in every location to get delisted.

    I deserve this, ipv9 is a pain but perhaps I can work on IPv3+3 in the coming weeks.

    Thanked by (1)FrankZ
  • skorupionskorupion Services Provider

    Glad to see you are back! How big is your commit with your ISP?

    Crunchbits Technical Support, Technical Writer, and Sales
    Contact me at: +1 (509) 606-3569 or [email protected]

  • mikhomikho AdministratorOG

    @ZizzyDizzyMC said:

    @yoursunny said:
    Offer violates rules:
    Setup fees are not allowed on any service other than dedicated servers.

    I cleared it with Mason ahead of time. I can remove it if they decide it's a no go afterwards.

    Confirmed

    Thanked by (1)ZizzyDizzyMC

    “Technology is best when it brings people together.” – Matt Mullenweg

  • MumblyMumbly

    @ZizzyDizzyMC said: Is it stable? Past year I've averaged about 98% uptime. So definitely better than a good share of providers I've used in the past when I was a low end buyer rather than provider.

    Isn't 98% uptime like a week and somethinge outage per year? Thanks for your honesty, but this isn’t something to brag about :)

  • ZizzyDizzyMCZizzyDizzyMC Hosting Provider
    edited November 24

    @Mumbly said:

    @ZizzyDizzyMC said: Is it stable? Past year I've averaged about 98% uptime. So definitely better than a good share of providers I've used in the past when I was a low end buyer rather than provider.

    Isn't 98% uptime like a week and somethinge outage per year? Thanks for your honesty, but this isn’t something to brag about :)

    I had a tractor destroy 5 miles of fiber in one night which lead to several hours of downtime. And you're correct, it's more like 99% because I've only averaged about 3 total days of downtime between my personal projects throughout the past year. Guess I should have done 362 / 365 and I'd have seen that 98 is a fair bit lower than 99 on the grand timescale of 365 days. One project had to deal with actual hardware issues and that took longer for shipping to get me a new CPU, not related to the rest of the rack or actual network connectivity.

    @skorupion said:
    Glad to see you are back! How big is your commit with your ISP?

    10g line, 5g commit. Realistically I can get an aggregate of about 3g up/down on the storage system and the smaller nodes share a series of smaller pipes in the rack. I've got room to grow, and a second line on the way in March / April of next year if I need to expand further.

    Thanked by (1)Mumbly
  • AuroraZeroAuroraZero ModeratorHosting Provider
    edited November 24

    What's the backup plans? What kind redundancy is in place in case of power outage?

    Free Hosting at YetiNode | Cryptid Security | URL Shortener | LaunchVPS | ExtraVM | Host-C | In the Node, or Out of the Loop?

  • ZizzyDizzyMCZizzyDizzyMC Hosting Provider

    @AuroraZero said:
    What's the backup plans? What kind redundancy is in place in case of power outage?

    I have a UPS that covers about an hour of power, and beyond that an external generator is started to run the systems. One of the biggest upgrades planned in 2025 is an automatic generator with a few days runtime in addition to about 30kw of solar storage. (Enough to cover most of the larger outages that happen throughout the year)

    Network redundancy isn't a thing yet. I'm not big enough to be able to afford that, and honestly not sure I'll ever get big enough to afford it.

    I designed my systems with data integrity first, and data availability second, and it shows. It's not for everyone, but I do have some clients already on the non public side when we were running as private that use the systems for offsite storage. Often moving physical HDDs around to migrate many TB's very fast by mail.

    I hope to be able to offer up a tape library storage option in the future, but the chances of me getting my hands on a modern tape library right now are quite low.

    Thanked by (4)Mumbly AuroraZero goinsj2010 skorous
Sign In or Register to comment.

© LowEndSpirit 2024

ipv6 ready