HDD or NVME VPS? We've got you covered! The plan you want most at €10/year.

root · August 27

@foxone said:

@tenpera said:
It's gotten better by 0.1MB/S.

dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test oflag=direct bs=64k count=16000
16000+0 records in
16000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB, 1000 MiB) copied, 108.387 s, 9.7 MB/s

From what I see it is you are abusing the resources you have, maybe you have a virus or something?

Some people tend to think the whole MicroSD storage cluster is dedicated to them.

bliss · August 28

@root said: Some people tend to think the whole MicroSD storage cluster is dedicated to them.

Your statement reminds me of a cheap MicroSD card of Chinese brand I bought around 10 years old, whose maximum speed is 1.1 MB/s then stabilizes at 800 KB/s. It's useless to me, so I installed it to my mother's smartphone as extended storage.

After that I only choose famous brands like SanDisk, Toshiba, or the like.

dev_vps · August 28

@c1vhosting said:
Hi,
we are working on improving IO speeds on the HDD node.

It has been 3 days.
Any ETA when this issue is expected to be resolved?

Calypso · August 28

@dev_vps said:

@c1vhosting said:
Hi,
we are working on improving IO speeds on the HDD node.

It has been 3 days.
Any ETA when this issue is expected to be resolved?

Please be patient. He's working on it. Have you already seen disruptions? You should have got a couple of them before he claims it's solved. Not that it then will be solved, it could be, but it also couldn't.

dev_vps · August 28

@Calypso said:

@dev_vps said:

@c1vhosting said:
Hi,
we are working on improving IO speeds on the HDD node.

It has been 3 days.
Any ETA when this issue is expected to be resolved?

Please be patient. He's working on it. Have you already seen disruptions? You should have got a couple of them before he claims it's solved. Not that it then will be solved, it could be, but it also couldn't.

Does performance advisory apply to ticket resolution speed as well?

Calypso · August 29

@dev_vps said:
Does performance advisory apply to ticket resolution speed as well?

Ofcourse. Just like being patient. And it'll get better.

DivZezo · August 29

is this offer for vps servers or just web hosting?
the cost is nice and cheap can i know if the offer for vps or webhosting please?
because i try to buy one of this plan but until now not paid cuz not see choice the linux system like ubuntu,centos...etc
or maybe can take the choice after pay for it?
have a nice day.

bliss · August 29

@DivZezo said: is this offer for vps servers or just web hosting?

Obviously VPS. Look at the title, there should be no ambiguity.

@DivZezo said: not see choice the linux system like ubuntu,centos...etc

Yes, there is. I always choose Debian.

C1V is very affordable but accordingly may not be as stable as you expect.

AlwaysSkint · August 29

^^ Another lamb to the slaughter.

dev_vps · August 29

@bliss said:

@DivZezo said: is this offer for vps servers or just web hosting?

Obviously VPS. Look at the title, there should be no ambiguity.

@DivZezo said: not see choice the linux system like ubuntu,centos...etc

Yes, there is. I always choose Debian.

C1V is very affordable but accordingly may not be as stable as you expect.

If you know how to install Debian 11 (or any other OS) directly from source iso url, that would be the best way to install OS on this VPS that comes with performance advisory. So keep the advisory in mind.

I am running Windows Server 2022 Standard edition. Having said that @c1vhosting is not among my list of recommended providers.

I will not renew c1v VPS at the term expiration.

dev_vps · August 29

@AlwaysSkint said:

^^ Another lamb to the slaughter.

Low price clouds the logical decision making

xx7879 · August 30

I have a VPS with them.
It's offline days ago, they help me to bring it back, and ask me to leave a review to get one resource upgrade.
The VPS died again after doing that, and nobody replys my tikect: #C1V_9960315_TCUSID.
What can I say?

cybertech · August 30

@xx7879 said:
I have a VPS with them.
It's offline days ago, they help me to bring it back, and ask me to leave a review to get one resource upgrade.
The VPS died again after done, and nobody replys my tikect: #C1V_9960315_TCUSID.
What can I say?

you can leave a bad review

dev_vps · August 30

@xx7879 said:
I have a VPS with them.
It's offline days ago, they help me to bring it back, and ask me to leave a review to get one resource upgrade.
The VPS died again after doing that, and nobody replys my tikect: #C1V_9960315_TCUSID.
What can I say?

This is unique, unforgettable, and unmatched performance

perfect to match with performance advisory.

When you buy cheap, you often pay twice—
once for the bargain and again for the regret.

@bliss said:

C1V is very affordable but accordingly may not be as stable as you expect.

Kris · August 30

[root@italy ~]# time df -h
Filesystem               Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs                 1.5G     0  1.5G   0% /dev
tmpfs                    1.5G   84K  1.5G   1% /dev/shm
tmpfs                    1.5G  161M  1.3G  11% /run
tmpfs                    1.5G     0  1.5G   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mapper/centos-root   50G  7.9G   43G  16% /
/dev/mapper/centos-home  846G   33M  846G   1% /home
/dev/vda1               1014M  202M  813M  20% /boot

real    0m7.064s
user    0m0.000s
sys 0m0.006s

only 7 seconds for df -h and the server boots. almost 100 IOPS too, zoom zoom zoom

cybertech · August 30

@dev_vps said:

@xx7879 said:
I have a VPS with them.
It's offline days ago, they help me to bring it back, and ask me to leave a review to get one resource upgrade.
The VPS died again after doing that, and nobody replys my tikect: #C1V_9960315_TCUSID.
What can I say?

This is unique, unforgettable, and unmatched performance

perfect to match with performance advisory.
When you buy cheap, you often pay twice—
once for the bargain and again for the regret.
@bliss said:

C1V is very affordable but accordingly may not be as stable as you expect.

how this provider is still allowed here is unbelievable

root · August 30

@dev_vps said:
If you know how to install Debian 11 (or any other OS) directly from source iso url, that would be the best way to install OS on this VPS that comes with performance advisory. So keep the advisory in mind.

Do you have a guide to boot netboot.xyz onto it?

msatt · August 30

@root said: Do you have a guide to boot netboot.xyz onto it?

You could try this (courtesty of @ehab ).

cochon · August 30

@msatt said:

@root said: Do you have a guide to boot netboot.xyz onto it?

You could try this (courtesty of @ehab ).

You should find that a netboot ISO is already mounted in the virtual CD-Rom, you can simply change the boot order temporarily, no need to mess with a donor OS. It's configurable via the 'edit pen' icon in the 'information' panel's title bar. You'll need to configure IP manually.

dev_vps · August 30

@tenpera said:

@c1vhosting said: Please open a ticket and send me ticket number.

ticket #C1V_8811836_TCUSID

is your issue resolved?

AuroraZero · August 30

@xx7879 said:
I have a VPS with them.
It's offline days ago, they help me to bring it back, and ask me to leave a review to get one resource upgrade.
The VPS died again after doing that, and nobody replys my tikect: #C1V_9960315_TCUSID.
What can I say?

I am going to investigate this further. @xx7879 we will talk in private.

_MS_ · August 30

@xx7879 said: ask me to leave a review to get one resource upgrade

A bannable offense (by a provider) in some forums.

dev_vps · August 30

@Kris said:
[root@italy ~]# time df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs 1.5G 0 1.5G 0% /dev
tmpfs 1.5G 84K 1.5G 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 1.5G 161M 1.3G 11% /run
tmpfs 1.5G 0 1.5G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mapper/centos-root 50G 7.9G 43G 16% /
/dev/mapper/centos-home 846G 33M 846G 1% /home
/dev/vda1 1014M 202M 813M 20% /boot

real 0m7.064s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.006s

only 7 seconds for df -h and the server boots. almost 100 IOPS too, zoom zoom zoom

on my c1v vps

root@cheapOne:~# time df -h
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
udev            3.8G     0  3.8G   0% /dev
tmpfs           776M  748K  775M   1% /run
/dev/sda1        79G  2.1G   74G   3% /
tmpfs           3.8G     0  3.8G   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs           5.0M     0  5.0M   0% /run/lock
/dev/sda15      124M   12M  113M  10% /boot/efi
tmpfs           776M     0  776M   0% /run/user/0

real    0m0.011s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.005s

Calypso · August 30

@cybertech said:

@xx7879 said:
I have a VPS with them.
It's offline days ago, they help me to bring it back, and ask me to leave a review to get one resource upgrade.
The VPS died again after done, and nobody replys my tikect: #C1V_9960315_TCUSID.
What can I say?

you can leave a bad review

Reviews and C1V is a funny story...

I did write a negative review about C1V on a well known review site.

First thing that happened, I got a mail from the review site: "C1V Hosting would love to understand your experience better, so they’ve asked for more details about your review—like an order number or email. If we don’t hear from you within 3 days, your review may be taken offline.". Well, no problem. I provided that.

Then another mail: "You reviewed C1V Hosting, who believe your review actually belongs to another business.". Well, I know for sure it isn't. So I let the review site know that I wasn't mistaking.

One month after that: "C1V Hosting has flagged your review for containing harmful or illegal content.". Pardon me? So I filed a complaint. "We’ve assessed your review for the reason it was flagged and determined that it follows our guidelines. Therefore, we’ve now put your review back online."

So basically, he tries to get negative reviews offline, with several attempts if it fails...

dev_vps · August 30

@Calypso said:

@cybertech said:

@xx7879 said:
I have a VPS with them.
It's offline days ago, they help me to bring it back, and ask me to leave a review to get one resource upgrade.
The VPS died again after done, and nobody replys my tikect: #C1V_9960315_TCUSID.
What can I say?

you can leave a bad review

Reviews and C1V is a funny story...

I did write a negative review about C1V on a well known review site.

Even the most trusted pilots hit turbulence while dealing with such providers.

dev_vps · August 30

@dev_vps said:

@bliss said:

@DivZezo said: is this offer for vps servers or just web hosting?

Obviously VPS. Look at the title, there should be no ambiguity.

@DivZezo said: not see choice the linux system like ubuntu,centos...etc

Yes, there is. I always choose Debian.

C1V is very affordable but accordingly may not be as stable as you expect.

If you know how to install Debian 11 (or any other OS) directly from source iso url, that would be the best way to install OS on this VPS that comes with performance advisory. So keep the advisory in mind.

I am running Windows Server 2022 Standard edition. Having said that @c1vhosting is not among my list of recommended providers.

I will not renew c1v VPS at the term expiration.

Running Windows 11 OS

dev_vps · August 30

@c1vhosting
The control panel shows much higher cpu utilization and memory used as compared to Windows Task Manager

bliss · August 30

@dev_vps said: Running Windows 11 OS

ur a noisy neighbour, because running Windows on such a cheap VPS consumes much more resources, which directly or indirectly deteriorates other customers' experience. ur quota of resources should be lower by C1V's AI scheduler.

dev_vps · August 30

@bliss said:

@dev_vps said: Running Windows 11 OS

ur a noisy neighbour, because running Windows on such a cheap VPS consumes much more resources, which directly or indirectly deteriorates other customers' experience. ur quota of resources should be lower by C1V's AI scheduler.

Did you look at the cpu resource utilization… it is around 15-20% range …
Did you look at memory utilization … it is below 40%
My storage space utilization is below 30%

So, kindly explain how I am consuming more resources?

dev_vps · August 30

@bliss
I have installed Debian 12 version in place to Windows 11, so that I am no longer a "noisy neighbor"

------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Information:
------------------------------------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 13 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697A v4 @ 2.60GHz
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2596.990 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 7.6 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 78.7 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-13-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Cinzia Tocci trading as C1V
ASN        : AS212271 Cinzia Tocci trading as C1V
Host       : C1V Hosting
Location   : Milan, Lombardy (25)
Country    : Italy

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 77.33 MB/s   (19.3k) | 776.98 MB/s  (12.1k)
Write      | 77.54 MB/s   (19.3k) | 781.07 MB/s  (12.2k)
Total      | 154.87 MB/s  (38.7k) | 1.55 GB/s    (24.3k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.47 GB/s     (2.8k) | 1.51 GB/s     (1.4k)
Write      | 1.54 GB/s     (3.0k) | 1.61 GB/s     (1.5k)
Total      | 3.01 GB/s     (5.8k) | 3.12 GB/s     (3.0k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 74.2 Mbits/sec  | 764 Mbits/sec   | 30.2 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 561 Mbits/sec   | 1.36 Gbits/sec  | 39.1 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 465 Mbits/sec   | 796 Mbits/sec   | 88.1 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 397 Mbits/sec   | 390 Mbits/sec   | 266 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 61.1 Mbits/sec  | 357 Mbits/sec   | 206 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 19.8 Mbits/sec  | 591 Mbits/sec   | 145 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 305 Mbits/sec   | 778 Mbits/sec   | 220 ms

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 583 Mbits/sec   | 879 Mbits/sec   | 30.1 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 608 Mbits/sec   | 1.75 Gbits/sec  | 33.0 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 447 Mbits/sec   | 957 Mbits/sec   | 88.6 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 345 Mbits/sec   | 818 Mbits/sec   | 268 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 10.1 Mbits/sec  | 90.4 Mbits/sec  | 205 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 22.7 Mbits/sec  | 858 Mbits/sec   | 149 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 266 Mbits/sec   | 924 Mbits/sec   | 222 ms

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 423
Multi Core      | 797
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22823746

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 510
Multi Core      | 893
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7561060

Speedtest by Ookla

Server: RETN - London
Idle Latency:    32.67 ms   (jitter: 0.14ms, low: 32.59ms, high: 32.89ms)
    Download:  1336.40 Mbps (data used: 1.7 GB)
                 47.55 ms   (jitter: 31.81ms, low: 29.29ms, high: 409.32ms)
      Upload:   443.66 Mbps (data used: 703.6 MB)
                 33.87 ms   (jitter: 3.62ms, low: 32.56ms, high: 85.64ms)
 Packet Loss:     0.0%
  Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/f2d7c83f-c574-42f3-806f-b362a5e408e0

Server: i3D.net - Dallas, TX
Idle Latency:   142.87 ms   (jitter: 6.84ms, low: 142.09ms, high: 155.96ms)
    Download:  1385.55 Mbps (data used: 1.6 GB)
                224.66 ms   (jitter: 67.12ms, low: 140.09ms, high: 325.07ms)
      Upload:   327.95 Mbps (data used: 566.8 MB)
                210.90 ms   (jitter: 64.62ms, low: 139.88ms, high: 290.87ms)
 Packet Loss:     0.0%
  Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/b8413311-db35-4fe9-aba9-fdfe345a11ea

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

if there is no or little cpu steal (as in the case of premium providers), the Windows Server OS is pretty resource optimized and does not need much resources.
Here is one example , the cpu utilization is below 2% ... yes 2%

Provider is BulletHost (in case you are interested)
.

Here is another example.
This is @host_c storage VPS (10TB one) and I am using as my primary Windows RDP dev machine. Look at the resource utilization below and running for 81+ days. It would have been 140+ days, but it has to be restarted to upgrade the 5TB storage to 10TB.

So, one can be running Windows RDP and still be resource optimized, provided the provider is premium.
and @host_c is one such provider.

.
Need more examples? @bliss

HDD or NVME VPS? We've got you covered! The plan you want most at €10/year.

Comments