This status code tells your domain's registry to not activate your domain in the DNS and as a consequence, it will not resolve. It is an uncommon status that is usually enacted during legal disputes, non-payment, or when your domain is subject to deletion.
Network Solutions has decided to put our domain name on Client Hold due to
a single phishing complaint about a web page, which happens to just be a
page of information about another domain from bgp.he.net. Network Solutions
has been contacted, and refuses to handle this issue in ANY expedited
manner. Executives from Hurricane have been calling and emailing Network
Solutions for HOURS trying to have this addressed. If anyone has an
escalation contact at Network Solutions, please email it to me at
redhead at lightning.net, or rfishler at he.net. Thanks.
@treesmokah said: KF is for sure not the only one who had to face de-peering etc.
These articles don't mention other cases.
I would like to know more about HE and their depeering cases not related to KF, if you would find them feel free to reach me via DM here or using email serhii.timofieiev at skhron.com.ua
@yoursunny said:
Just as I'm about to move the authoritative nameserver for an internal domain, HE.NET is no longer in clientHold status.
All is good now, I hope?
I really like he.net, but it does bother me that they are not more resilient.
I mean, my personal domains that are absolutely non-critical have 6 authoritative servers under 3 different tld's. It costs absolute peanuts and is so easy to setup.
@rcy026 said:
I really like he.net, but it does bother me that they are not more resilient.
I mean, my personal domains that are absolutely non-critical have 6 authoritative servers under 3 different tld's. It costs absolute peanuts and is so easy to setup.
@rcy026 said:
I really like he.net, but it does bother me that they are not more resilient.
I mean, my personal domains that are absolutely non-critical have 6 authoritative servers under 3 different tld's. It costs absolute peanuts and is so easy to setup.
How would you suggest HE be more resilient?
Providing NS records under different registries is becoming an industry standard. But it really wasn't when they started, plus the service is provided at no cost for everyone, so it is difficult to complain.
@rcy026 said:
I really like he.net, but it does bother me that they are not more resilient.
I mean, my personal domains that are absolutely non-critical have 6 authoritative servers under 3 different tld's. It costs absolute peanuts and is so easy to setup.
How would you suggest HE be more resilient?
Providing NS records under different registries is becoming an industry standard. But it really wasn't when they started, plus the service is provided at no cost for everyone, so it is difficult to complain.
He.net also owns lightning.net domain:
It uses its subdomains as nameservers and registered with other registrar.
However I don't think there's any way for the clients to use it.
@rcy026 said:
I really like he.net, but it does bother me that they are not more resilient.
I mean, my personal domains that are absolutely non-critical have 6 authoritative servers under 3 different tld's. It costs absolute peanuts and is so easy to setup.
How would you suggest HE be more resilient?
Providing NS records under different registries is becoming an industry standard. But it really wasn't when they started, plus the service is provided at no cost for everyone, so it is difficult to complain.
He.net also owns lightning.net domain:
It uses its subdomains as nameservers and registered with other registrar.
However I don't think there's any way for the clients to use it.
Where does HE use the lightning.net domain for NS?
@rcy026 said:
I really like he.net, but it does bother me that they are not more resilient.
I mean, my personal domains that are absolutely non-critical have 6 authoritative servers under 3 different tld's. It costs absolute peanuts and is so easy to setup.
How would you suggest HE be more resilient?
Providing NS records under different registries is becoming an industry standard. But it really wasn't when they started, plus the service is provided at no cost for everyone, so it is difficult to complain.
He.net also owns lightning.net domain:
It uses its subdomains as nameservers and registered with other registrar.
However I don't think there's any way for the clients to use it.
Where does HE use the lightning.net domain for NS?
Whois screenshot above −> second and third rows from the bottom −> Name Server
@rcy026 said:
I really like he.net, but it does bother me that they are not more resilient.
I mean, my personal domains that are absolutely non-critical have 6 authoritative servers under 3 different tld's. It costs absolute peanuts and is so easy to setup.
How would you suggest HE be more resilient?
Providing NS records under different registries is becoming an industry standard. But it really wasn't when they started, plus the service is provided at no cost for everyone, so it is difficult to complain.
He.net also owns lightning.net domain:
It uses its subdomains as nameservers and registered with other registrar.
However I don't think there's any way for the clients to use it.
Where does HE use the lightning.net domain for NS?
Whois screenshot above −> second and third rows from the bottom −> Name Server
I meant where does HE use the lightning.net NS, other than on the lightning.net domain itself.
@rcy026 said:
I really like he.net, but it does bother me that they are not more resilient.
I mean, my personal domains that are absolutely non-critical have 6 authoritative servers under 3 different tld's. It costs absolute peanuts and is so easy to setup.
@rcy026 said:
I really like he.net, but it does bother me that they are not more resilient.
I mean, my personal domains that are absolutely non-critical have 6 authoritative servers under 3 different tld's. It costs absolute peanuts and is so easy to setup.
How would you suggest HE be more resilient?
I literally explained it in the post you quoted.
I've read that additional authoritative NS adds some latency. I'm not certain of the veracity of that claim.
@rcy026 said:
I really like he.net, but it does bother me that they are not more resilient.
I mean, my personal domains that are absolutely non-critical have 6 authoritative servers under 3 different tld's. It costs absolute peanuts and is so easy to setup.
How would you suggest HE be more resilient?
I literally explained it in the post you quoted.
I've read that additional authoritative NS adds some latency. I'm not certain of the veracity of that claim.
@rcy026 said:
I really like he.net, but it does bother me that they are not more resilient.
I mean, my personal domains that are absolutely non-critical have 6 authoritative servers under 3 different tld's. It costs absolute peanuts and is so easy to setup.
How would you suggest HE be more resilient?
I literally explained it in the post you quoted.
I've read that additional authoritative NS adds some latency. I'm not certain of the veracity of that claim.
Why are you not certain?
I'm not up to speed with the technical aspects regarding latency. Does it, in fact, introduce additional latency?
Comments
amazing news
WHOIS he.net
clientHold
This status code tells your domain's registry to not activate your domain in the DNS and as a consequence, it will not resolve. It is an uncommon status that is usually enacted during legal disputes, non-payment, or when your domain is subject to deletion.
HostBrr aff best VPS; VirmAche aff worst VPS.
Unable to push-up due to shoulder injury 😣
He had it coming?
owned. Fuck around and find out, outplayed in their own game.
https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2024-July/225901.html
What do you mean? Is it something KF related?
Check our KVM VPS (flags are clickable): 🇵🇱 🇸🇪 | Looking glass: 🇵🇱 🇸🇪
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/10/internet-not-facebook-why-infrastructure-providers-should-stay-out-content
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/08/isps-should-not-police-online-speech-no-matter-how-awful-it
Many such cases. I hope they enjoy 4th of July and maybe read the constitution.
Am I blind or the entire article is about that attitude in general, and the only "real-life" case is KF?
Check our KVM VPS (flags are clickable): 🇵🇱 🇸🇪 | Looking glass: 🇵🇱 🇸🇪
KF is for sure not the only one who had to face de-peering etc.
These articles don't mention other cases.
I would like to know more about HE and their depeering cases not related to KF, if you would find them feel free to reach me via DM here or using email serhii.timofieiev at skhron.com.ua
Check our KVM VPS (flags are clickable): 🇵🇱 🇸🇪 | Looking glass: 🇵🇱 🇸🇪
Just as I'm about to move the authoritative nameserver for an internal domain, HE.NET is no longer in clientHold status.
All is good now, I hope?
HostBrr aff best VPS; VirmAche aff worst VPS.
Unable to push-up due to shoulder injury 😣
Should be, yeah.
They were out for about 4 hours I heard.
Time to transfer out the domain
Amadex • Hosting Forums • Wie ist meine IP-Adresse? • AS215325
Forum for System Administrators: sysadminforum.com
Their IANA ID is literally 2.
You'd think they would know what they are doing by now.
One might think that of the U.S. DOD as well, but apparently they don't!
Free Hosting at YetiNode | Cryptid Security | URL Shortener | LaunchVPS | ExtraVM | Host-C | In the Node, or Out of the Loop?
hehe
Looks like they were able to get ahold of someone and get it unsuspended https://community.nanog.org/t/he-net-problem/59634/15
🏗️ NameCrane - Shared, Reseller, Semi-Dedicated Hosting / cPanel + DirectAdmin / Ryzen + NVMe + 10Gbps / Free Blesta!
🇺🇸🇬🇧🇱🇺🇸🇬 Now in Singapore 👉 Shared Hosting from $8/yr 🏆 $2/mo Reseller Hosting
I really like he.net, but it does bother me that they are not more resilient.
I mean, my personal domains that are absolutely non-critical have 6 authoritative servers under 3 different tld's. It costs absolute peanuts and is so easy to setup.
Network Solutions is the original, monopoly, registrar.
How would you suggest HE be more resilient?
[deleted]
Providing NS records under different registries is becoming an industry standard. But it really wasn't when they started, plus the service is provided at no cost for everyone, so it is difficult to complain.
OpenVPN installer | WireGuard installer
He.net also owns lightning.net domain:
It uses its subdomains as nameservers and registered with other registrar.
However I don't think there's any way for the clients to use it.
Where does HE use the lightning.net domain for NS?
Whois screenshot above −> second and third rows from the bottom −> Name Server
I meant where does HE use the lightning.net NS, other than on the lightning.net domain itself.
I literally explained it in the post you quoted.
I've read that additional authoritative NS adds some latency. I'm not certain of the veracity of that claim.
Why are you not certain?
dnscry.pt - Public DNSCrypt resolvers hosted by LowEnd providers • Need a free NAT LXC? -> https://microlxc.net/
I'm not up to speed with the technical aspects regarding latency. Does it, in fact, introduce additional latency?